pl unsubscribe me
On 12/28/09, Subscriptions wrote:
>
> I am trying to write a query analyzer to pull:
>
>
>
> 1. Common phrases (also known as Collocations) with in a query
>
>
>
> 2. Highly unusual phrases (also known as Statistically Improbable
> Phrases or SIPs) with in a query
>
>
Hi,
Jay Fisher wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to formulate the following query in solrJ. This is
the only way I can get the desired result but I can't figure out how to get
solrJ to generate the same query string. It always generates a url that
starts with select and I need it to start with spe
Thank you. That did it.
~ Jay
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Sascha Szott wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Jay Fisher wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to find a way to formulate the following query in solrJ. This
>> is
>> the only way I can get the desired result but I can't figure out how to
>> get
>> solrJ to gener
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> I tried... I set APR to improve performance... server is slow while replica;
> but "top" shows only 1% of I/O wait... it is probably environment specific;
So you're saying that stock tomcat (non-native APR) was also 10 times slower?
> but the
Hello,
when searching for a string: "asdf5qwerty" solr will tokenize it to:
"asdf", "5", "qwerty" and display documents matching either string.
How can i stop this behaviour and make it just search for plain
"asdf5qwerty"?
thanks in advance.
Bernd
Thank you Yonik, excellent WIKI! I'll try without APR, I believe it's
environmental issue; 100Mbps switched should do 10 times faster (current
replica speed is 1Mbytes/sec)
> -Original Message-
> From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
> Seeley
> Sent: Januar
> when searching for a string: "asdf5qwerty" solr will
> tokenize it to:
> "asdf", "5", "qwerty" and display documents matching either
> string.
>
> How can i stop this behaviour and make it just search for
> plain
> "asdf5qwerty"?
What is the type of your field? If you have solr.WordDelimiterFi
This is an *extremely* useful page for figuring out what various
tokenizers/filters are doing. The javadocs for the classes
referenced can also provide some additional details
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters
Erick
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Bernd Brod wrote
Related to the difference between rsync and native Solr replication -
we are seeing issues with Solr 1.4 where search queries that come in
during a replication request hang for excessive amount of time (up to
100's of seconds for a result normally that takes ~50 ms).
We are replicating pretty ofte
At the NOVA Apache Lucene/Solr Meetup last May, one of the speakers
from Near Infinity (Aaron McCurry I think) mentioned that he had a
patch for lucene that enabled unlimited depth memory-efficient paging.
Is anyone in contact with him?
-Peter
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Grant Ingersoll w
Lance:
At times we dont have the freedom make these Database changes.
Currently I am in this situation. Hence the requirement on the DIH.
~Ravi.
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> The other option is to have a 'deleted' column in your table, and have
> the applica
Is there any way to modify result ranking using an integer field?
I have documents that have an integer field "popularity".
I want to rank results by a combination of normal fulltext search
relevance and popularity. It's kinda like search in digg - result
ranking is based on the search releva
> Is there any way to modify result
> ranking using an integer field?
>
> I have documents that have an integer field "popularity".
>
> I want to rank results by a combination of normal fulltext
> search
> relevance and popularity. It's kinda like search in digg -
> result
> ranking is based
Hi All,
Anyone who knows how to index the latest MS office documents like .docx and
.xlsx ?
>From searching it seems like Tika only supports the earlier formats .doc and
>.xls
med venlig hilsen/best regards
Roland Villemoes
Tel: (+45) 22 69 59 62
E-Mail: mailto:r...@alpha-solutions.dk
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Peter Wolanin wrote:
> Related to the difference between rsync and native Solr replication -
> we are seeing issues with Solr 1.4 where search queries that come in
> during a replication request hang for excessive amount of time (up to
> 100's of seconds for a resul
Hi Roland,
You probably want to send your email to tika-u...@lucene.apache.org.
Best of luck!
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/3/10 4:00 PM, "Roland Villemoes" wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Anyone who knows how to index the latest MS office documents like .docx and
> .xlsx ?
>
> From searching it seems like Ti
I have a Solr (version 1.3) powered search server running in production.
Search is keyword driven is supported using custom fields and tokenizers.
I am planning to build a rules engine on top search. The rules are database
driven and can't be stored inside solr indexes. These rules would ultimatel
> Sorting and index norms have space penalties.
> Sorting on a field creates an array of Java ints, one for every
> document in the index. Index norms (used for boosting documents and
> other things) create an array of bytes in the Lucene index files, one
> for every document in the index.
> If you
: > If you sort on many of your dynamic fields your memory use will
: > explode, and the same with index norms and disk space.
: Thanks for the info. In general, I knew sorting was expensive, but I didn't
: realize that dynamic fields made it worse.
dynamic fields don't make it worse ... the nu
>
> dynamic fields don't make it worse ... the number of actaul field names
> you sort on makes it worse.
>
> If you sort on 100 fields, the cost is the same regardless of wether all
> 100 of those fields exist because of a single declaration,
> or 100 distinct declarations.
>
Ahh...thanks for t
Thanks Ahmet.
Do I need to do anything to enable BoostQParserPlugin in Solr, or is it already
enabled?
--- On Sun, 1/3/10, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
From: Ahmet Arslan
Subject: Re: Any way to modify result ranking using an integer field?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Sunday, January 3, 2010
Hello everyone,
Is there an article which explains (on a high level) the algorithm of search in
Solr?
How does Solr search approach compare to the "inverted index" technique?
Regards,
Abhishek
--Original Message--
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
ReplyTo: s
: Yes, I thought about adding some 'new syntax', but I opted for a separate
'facet.sortorder' parameter,
:
: mainly because I'm not familiar enough with the codebase to know what effect
this might have on
:
: backward compatibility. It would be easy enough to modify the patch I created
to do
What I meant was that is there any way to make {!boost b=log(popularity)} the
default query type so that every query will be using it.
From: Andy
Subject: Re: Any way to modify result ranking using an integer field?
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Monday, January 4, 2010, 1:08 AM
Thanks
24 matches
Mail list logo
