Hi,
I think the cause of the problem is the WordDelimiterFilterFactory. With
your current configuration indexing i-like results in 3 terms being indexed
- i, like and ilike. Then when you query for ilike, you match the 3rd
term. The term ilike is created by the WordDelimiterFilter due to the
ca
hossman wrote:
>
> : > The request I would like to write is
> : >
> : > "Delete from my solr Index the id that are no longer present in my
> : > table_document"
> : >
> : > With Lucene I had a way to do that :
> : > open IndexReader,
> : > for each lucene document : check in table_document and r
Hi
I'm using dynamic fields and was wandering how to retrieve information
about used indices (wether they are empty and what actually do exist)
via a a rest call?
I get a list of fieldnames at the admin location and I wanted to
retrieve this information in my php application.
Thanks,
Alexander
you can write a onImportEnd event handler also
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:28 PM, clico wrote:
>
>
> hossman wrote:
>>
>> : > The request I would like to write is
>> : >
>> : > "Delete from my solr Index the id that are no longer present in my
>> : > table_document"
>> : >
>> : > With Lucene I had a
Hi ,
Thanks for your help.
So do I have to do:
public Scorer scorer(IndexReader reader) throws IOException {
SolrIndexReader solrReader = (SolrIndexReader) reader;
int offset = solrReader.getBase() ;
Or is it a bit more complex than that?
Jerome.
2009/8/20 Mark Miller :
> Jérôme Etévé wrot
Thank you for your response, it just worked!
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Chris Male wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the cause of the problem is the WordDelimiterFilterFactory. With
> your current configuration indexing i-like results in 3 terms being indexed
> - i, like and ilike. Then when you
I don't understand this point.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Remove-data-from-index-tp25063736p25080669.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I had similar task but I simply used SolrJ client for that; I was forced to
keep track on deleted docs in table_document... now, I am using "delete by
query" (with SolrJ) - each document has a timestamp which I query...
For instance, you can update (allowOverwrite=true) whole SOLR index, but put
c
I can't understand: do you use several web applications in a same container?
Are you trying to close shared SolrCore when one of many users (of another
application) logs off?
Usually one needs to clean up only user-session specific objects (such as
non-persistent shopping cart)...
-Original
I was joking [off-topic]; "faceting" as a DocSet intersections' replaced by
trivial term count calcs which is extremely faster in some (if not all) use
cases, including possibly even NON-tokenized (with standard faceting we can
use FilterCache)...
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-475
(and
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> I was joking [off-topic]; "faceting" as a DocSet intersections' replaced by
> trivial term count calcs which is extremely faster in some (if not all) use
> cases, including possibly even NON-tokenized (with standard faceting we can
> use Filter
>actually a hybrid that goes back to DocSet intersections when it's more
efficient
I noticed that too when I played with it, for large query results DocSet
intersections are de-facto standard; but when "faceting" started CNET had
only 400,000 documents :)
Nowadays even 2-3 seconds response time i
I ended up not using an XML attribute for the payload since I need to return
the payload in query response. So I ended up going with:
2.0|Solr In Action
My payload is numeric so I can pick a non-numeric delimiter (ie '|').
Putting the payload in front means I don't have to worry about the delimi
Ok, some improvement; "Faceting" as an end-user interface feature (or may be
"Filtering"?):
A. Faceting (for further filtering)
1. We are counting "facets"
2. Sorting by "counts" in descending order
3. Presenting top-N to user for possible filtering/narrowing search results
B.
"Simplified Lucene
I want the query to return all the found docs, not just 10 of them by
default. It could be in the thousands. So i can furture process the
returned json structure in my javascript.
Is such option? What should i do with the 'rows' number in the
solrconfig.xml file?
Thanks.
-
fast_warm
0
10
-
I guess you'd set the the rows parameter in the HTTP request to a high
number? Check out /solr/admin/form.jsp which has the rows text field
visible.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Elaine Li wrote:
> I want the query to return all the found docs, not just 10 of them by
> default. It could be in
It seems possible to cache the results of facet queries on a per
segment basis, providing the caching you're describing.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
>>actually a hybrid that goes back to DocSet intersections when it's more
> efficient
>
> I noticed that too when I played wi
Coming back to Question one
This is how my standard handler looks like
12
explicit
make,model
i added fl parameter which return me those fields described, for this also
i have to delete my browser cache and after that by defatul only those two
fields a
: I want the query to return all the found docs, not just 10 of them by
: default. It could be in the thousands. So i can furture process the
: returned json structure in my javascript.
FAQ...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FAQ#head-ad538363dc33eba936af39b95ad0f0e719
Imagine we have following sorted table for a whole Lucene index on term
values for a field, and a need to have top-10 facets for large resultset:
Digital: 1,700,000
Books: 1,000,000
Computers: 900,000
...
(term:count) sorted in desc order by "count" for a whole index; FilterCache
etc
Suppose that
thanks for the info.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Chris
Hostetter wrote:
>
> : I want the query to return all the found docs, not just 10 of them by
> : default. It could be in the thousands. So i can furture process the
> : returned json structure in my javascript.
>
> FAQ...
>
> http://wiki.
Hi,
In every doc of mine, there is a sentence.
I tried to set the sentence to fieldtype as one of the three 'text',
'text_ws' and 'textTight'. None of them produce the correct result.
For eg.
"The Arab Presense" is returned when I search for ("arabic").
"to confirm the existence of many communi
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> If he really needs to hardcode the cookie value into code, wouldn't it be
> easier to extend HttpClient and modify the methods which take in an
> HttpMethod object to first set the cookie on those obejcts before
> delegating to super?
>
>
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Alexander Herzog wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm using dynamic fields and was wandering how to retrieve information
> about used indices (wether they are empty and what actually do exist)
> via a a rest call?
>
Did you mean used field names instead of indices?
I think /admi
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Phillip Farber wrote:
>
> What will the client receive from the primary solr instance if that
> instance doesn't get HTTP 200 from all the shards in a multi-shard query?
>
>
An exception is thrown. There's an open issue on returning partial
responses:
https://iss
And another option: implement simple proxy between SolrJ and rest of world...
As I understand in your design SOLR is behind Proxy which needs Cookie.
What I can't understand is: your web application uses SSO for authentication,
and it uses SolrJ to retrieve results from SOLR and present it to
>
> "The Arab Presense" is returned when I search for ("arabic").
> "to confirm the existence of many communities.." is returned when i search
> for ("the existing").
>
All such results are returned back due to something known as stemming. The
stock "text" field definition comes bundled with a ste
FYI, I'm on vacation in Ocean City MD starting tomorrow - but I will
have internet access.
The goal of releasing a week after 2.9 still seems very realistic - we
just need to decide to finish all open issues one week from Lucene's
code freeze. And all of a sudden, Lucene went from 0 open issues,
b
yes, i meant field names.
Thanks for the information, that's perfect
regards,
Alexander
Shalin Shekhar Mangar schrieb:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Alexander Herzog
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm using dynamic fields and was wandering how to retrieve information
> > about used indices (weth
29 matches
Mail list logo
