Le 03-juil.-09 à 07:43, Michael Lackhoff a écrit :
On 03.07.2009 00:49 Paul Libbrecht wrote:
[I'll try to address the other responses as well]
I believe the proper way is for the server to compute a list of
accepted languages in order of preferences.
The web-platform language (e.g. the user-
Hi,
I got several issues with custom query parser. Actually all I am doing
is extending
org.apache.solr.search.LuceneQParserPluginoverwritingpublic
QParser createParser(String qstr, SolrParams localParams,
SolrParams params, SolrQueryRequest req) {
so that I can adjust params
Otis,
Thanks a lot. I'd certainly follow your advice and check the logs. Although,
I must say that I've already tried all possible variations of the string for
the "fl" parameter (spaces, commas, plus signs). More than that - the query
still doesn't want to fetch any docs (other than the one with
DocSet isn't an object it's an interface. The DocSlice class
*implements* DocSet.
What you're saying about set operations not working for DocSlice but
working for DocSet then doesn't make any sense... can you clarify?
The failure of these set operations to work as expected is confusing the
hel
Hello,
When indexing or querying text, i'm using the solr.StopFilterFactory ; it seems
to works just fine...
But I want to use the text field as a facet, and get all the commonly used
words in a set of results, without the stopwords. As far as I tried, I always
get stopwords, and numerical te
Pierre - the field you're faceting must not have the StopFilter
applied at indexing time, or the words you want removed aren't in the
stop word list file.
Erik
On Jul 3, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Pierre-Yves LANDRON wrote:
Hello,
When indexing or querying text, i'm using the
solr.StopF
Hi list,
I am new to this list and just starting solr. My question is how can we merge
the results of two different searches. I mean if we have a function that has
two threads so it has to go to two differen solr servers to get the result. Is
there any way to merge the result using solr and solr
Hi All, (sorry for the cross-post)
For those in NYC, there will be a Lucene ecosystem (Lucene/Solr/Mahout/
Nutch/Tika/Droids/Lucene ports) Meetup on July 22, hosted by MTV
Networks and co-sponsored with Lucid Imagination.
For more info and to RSVP, see http://www.meetup.com/NYC-Apache-Lucene
What you are talking about is federated search, and is beyond the
scope of Solr. However, maybe you can merge the two indexes into one
index, and then distribute over multiple servers to get the
performance you are looking for?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch
Eric
On Jul 3,
I've opened a JIRA issue for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1260
And what I meant by "set operations were only designed for DocSets
(as opposed to DocLists)" I meant that Solr has never done set
operations on DocList objects AFAIK, and so there aren't any tests for
it.
-Yonik
h
Hi all!
I'd like to know if there is anything built into Solr that keeps track
of keywords being searched and has statistics of those?
If not, and or in any case, I'd like to hear what approaches are being
used by users to know what people is searching for in their apps.
Thanks in advance!
I tried it with the latest nightly build and got the same result.
Actually that was the symptom and it made me looking at the index directory.
The same log messages repeated again and again, never end.
2009/7/2 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> jay , I see updating index properties... twice
>
>
>
>
Hi everybody,
Let's say I had an index with 10M large-ish documents, and as people
logged into a website and viewed them the "last viewed date" was updated to
the current time. We index a document's last-viewed-date because we allow
users to a) search on this last-viewed-date alongside all oth
I don't have a very specific suggestion, but I wonder if you could have a data
structure that lives outside of the main index and keeps only these dates.
Presumably this smaller data structure would be simpler/faster to update, and
you'd just have to remain in sync with the main index (documen
Sergey,
I think I confused you. The comment about the fields listed in the "fl"
parameter has nothing to do with the SolrJ calls not working.
For SolrJ calls not working my suggestion is to look at the logs and compare
the GetMethod call with the SolrJ call. Paste them if you want more peopl
Yes, it could be a problem. For some reason over the last few days several
people mentioned trying to build indices with Lucene directly. Not sure why
that;s so attractive...
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: James liu
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
