DocSet isn't an object it's an interface. The DocSlice class
*implements* DocSet.
What you're saying about set operations not working for DocSlice but
working for DocSet then doesn't make any sense... can you clarify?
The failure of these set operations to work as expected is confusing the
hell out of me too!
Thanks
Ben
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Candide Kemmler<cand...@palacehotel.org> wrote:
I have a simple question rel the DocSlice class. I'm trying to use the (very
handy) set operations on DocSlices and I'm rather confused by the way it
behaves.
I have 2 DocSlices, atlDocs which, by looking at the debugger, holds a
"docs" array of ints of size 1; the second DocSlice is btlDocs, with a
"docs" array of ints of size 67. I know that atlDocs is a subset of btlDocs,
so the doing btlDocs.andNotSize(atlDocs) should really return 66.
But it's returning 10.
The short answer is that all of the set operations were only designed
for DocSets (as opposed to DocLists).
Yes, perhaps DocList should not have extended DocSet...
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
