Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
Quite the opposite, you are actually working with some advanced stuff :)
Thank you for the response.
Please have some patience, someone is
Ok, I will have (what else could I do? ;) ). Meanwhile I while try some
things and continue to search the web.
Greetings
Added appriopriate amendment to FAQ, but I'd consider reorganizing
information in the whole wiki, like creating a section titled "Common
Tasks". Bit of redundancy does not hurt if it comes to documentation.
Wiadomość napisana w dniu 2009-01-28, o godz. 20:01, przez Mike Klaas:
Well, both pag
have two different cores and you can have separate schema for each.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Cheng Zhang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to define more than one schema? I'm reading the example
> schema.xml. It seems that we can only define one schema? What about if I want
> to define
We were able to deploy Solr 1.3 on Weblogic 10.0 earlier today. Doing
so required two changes:
1) Creating a weblogic.xml file in solr.war's WEB-INF directory. The
weblogic.xml file is required to disable Solr's filter on FORWARD.
The contents of weblogic.xml should be:
http://www.bea.
Cross-posting this announcement. There are several relevant Lucene/
Solr talks including:
Trainings
- Lucene Boot Camp (Grant Ingersoll)
- Solr Boot Camp (Erik Hatcher)
Sessions
- Introducing Apache Mahout (Grant)
- Lucene Case Studies (Erik)
- Advanced Indexing Techniques with Apach
Gert Brinkmann wrote:
>> A) fuzzy search
>>
>> What can I do to speed up the fuzzy query?
Setting ramBufferSizeMB to a higher value seems to speed up the query
slightly. I have to continue with tuning though.
>> B) combine stemming, prefix and fuzzy search
>>
>> Is there a way to combine all th
Further investigations leads me to think that I could achieve this by using
the parameters facet.offset and facet.limit. I wonder how to do this with
solrj, as I can see the SolrQuery.setFacetLimit() method but not a method to
specify the facet offset. I guess I can extend the class and the offset
We should get this on the wiki.
- Mark
Ilan Rabinovitch wrote:
We were able to deploy Solr 1.3 on Weblogic 10.0 earlier today. Doing
so required two changes:
1) Creating a weblogic.xml file in solr.war's WEB-INF directory. The
weblogic.xml file is required to disable Solr's filter on F
Ilan,
I had the same problem some months ago and had to remove the quoted line on
jsp. But I never got the other problem you said with 1.3 in Weblogic.
2009/1/29 Ilan Rabinovitch
>
> We were able to deploy Solr 1.3 on Weblogic 10.0 earlier today. Doing so
> required two changes:
>
> 1) Creatin
I'm running the example from the DIH wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr-data/attachments/DataImportHandler/attachments/example-solr-home.jar
-Nathan
From: Noble Paul ??? ?? [mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wed 01/28/2009 11:32 PM
To: solr-user
Which appears to be v1.3, which explains the problem. Thanks!
From: Nathan Adams [mailto:na...@umich.edu]
Sent: Thu 01/29/2009 8:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: DIH handling of missing files
I'm running the example from the DIH wiki page:
h
Hi,
I am doing fuzzy search. And works correctly. For some reason though it
has problems with uppercase words.
e.g if I search moo~I get results but if I do Moo~ I don't.
I see in analyzer that LowerCaseFilterFactory is hitting but I gess with
fuzzy it's getting messy.
Any clue someone?
Ch
Hi,
I have a requirement like, There is a running solr and having around
10K records indexed in it. Now i have to index another set of 30K records?
The 10K data already in live, And i dont have an option to insert
that 30K records in live,
Is there any way to run the solr in
Thank you both for points. For now I am hanlding with fuzzy search.
Let's hope this will do for sometime :)
Walter Underwood wrote:
> I've done this. There are five cases for the tokens in the search
> index:
>
> 1. Tokens that are unique after stemming (this is good).
> 2. Tokens that are common
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Kalidoss MM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement like, There is a running solr and having around
> 10K records indexed in it. Now i have to index another set of 30K records?
>
> The 10K data already in live, And i dont have an option to insert
> that 3
Hi,
I would like to know how can I check properly if a snapshot has been done
except by checking in the data directory.
Does snapshooter.log file is updated if snapshoot is executed automaticly
after a commit?
Is there a way to check snapshoot or snapinstaller last activity by
stats.jsp, don't
Hi,
I've one server and several slaves and I would like to know if I go to the
host.name/solr/admin/stat.jsp if there is a way to know the difference of
the numDoc per server?
Thanks a lot
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/MASTER---SLAVES-numdoc-tp21730748p21730748.html
S
snapshooter.log logs all invocation of the snapshooter, including the
automatic ones triggered by a commit/optimize.
There are log files in the logs directory on various status/stats:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCollectionDistributionStatusStats
These status/stats can be displayed in the adm
Hi,
Do you think it's normal to have warmupTime : 0 ??
searcher
class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher
version:1.0
description:index searcher
stats: searcherName : searc...@6f7cf6b6 main
caching : true
numDocs : 8207035
maxDoc : 8239991
readerImpl : ReadOnlyMultiSe
Julian Davchev wrote:
Hi,
I am doing fuzzy search. And works correctly. For some reason though it
has problems with uppercase words.
e.g if I search moo~I get results but if I do Moo~ I don't.
I see in analyzer that LowerCaseFilterFactory is hitting but I gess with
fuzzy it's getting mess
Sorry if this is wrong place to ask since Solr Gaze is Lucid's
proejct, but I was trying to install this in a multicore environment,
and it doesn't seem to be working.
It says to add the plugin to solr.home/lib.
Which solr.home? I got to /gaze and of course, it doesn't know where to look.
Thank
Hi all,
in my schema I have two multivalued fields as
and I issued a query as: start_year:[400 TO *], the result seems to be
incorrect because I got some records with start year = - 3000... and also
start year = -2147483647 (Integer.MINVALUE) Also when I combine start_year
with end_year, it a
Truncation queries and stemming are difficult partners. You likely have
to accept compromise. You can try using multiple fields like you are,
you can try indexing the full term at the same position as the stemmed
term, or you can accept the weirdness that comes from matching on a
stemmed form (
Julian Davchev wrote:
Hi,
Any documents or something I can read on how locks work and how I can
controll it. When do they occur etc.
Cause only way I got out of this mess was restarting tomcat
SEVERE: org.apache.lucene.store.LockObtainFailedException: Lock obtain
timed out: SingleInstanceLock: w
Jacob Singh wrote:
Sorry if this is wrong place to ask since Solr Gaze is Lucid's
proejct, but I was trying to install this in a multicore environment,
and it doesn't seem to be working.
It says to add the plugin to solr.home/lib.
Which solr.home? I got to /gaze and of course, it doesn't know
if i go to /solr/admin/logging, i can set the "root" log level to
WARNING, which is what i want. however, every time solr restarts, it is
set back to INFO. Is there a way to get the WARNING level to stick
permanently?
-jsd-
Currently I'm using SOLR 1.2 to index a few million documents. It's
been requested that a way for users to rate the documents be done so
that something rated higher would show up higher in search results and
vice verse.
I've been thinking about it, but can't come up with a good way to do
this and
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
> if i go to /solr/admin/logging, i can set the "root" log level to WARNING,
> which is what i want. however, every time solr restarts, it is set back to
> INFO. Is there a way to get the WARNING level to stick permanently?
>
>
Hi,
You can se
You could use a boost function to gently boost up items which were
marked as more popular.
You would send the function query in the "bf" parameter with your
query, and you can find out more about syntax here: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery
Thanks for your time!
Matthew Runo
Soft
Noble,
Thanks for the suggestion. The unfortunate thing is that we really don't
know ahead of time what sort of replication delay we're going to encounter
-- it could be one millisecond or it could be one hour. So, we end up
needing to do something like:
For delta-import run N:
1. query DB slave
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
> Julian, have you had any luck figuring this out? My production instance
> just started having this problem. It seems to crop up after solr's been
> running for several hours. Our usage is very light (maybe one query every
> few seconds). I
Hi Mark,
Thanks, I've got it working now. Still waiting for the stats to update...
This is really cool! I've also been working pretty hard at an
automated benchmark suite using jmeter, rightscale and amazon web
services. Next time I'm in Boston (March I think), it would be great
to show you.
B
Vannia Rajan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
if i go to /solr/admin/logging, i can set the "root" log level to WARNING,
which is what i want. however, every time solr restarts, it is set back to
INFO. Is there a way to get the WARNING level to stick permanently?
Hello All,
I'm new to Solr, so forgive me if I'm overlooking something obvious. My
observation is that the spellcheck.onlyMorePopular property of the
SpellCheckComponent seems to not do what I expect.
If I send the query "calvin klien" to my data store, then the spell
checker correctly suggests "
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Jon Drukman wrote:
Julian, have you had any luck figuring this out? My production instance
just started having this problem. It seems to crop up after solr's been
running for several hours. Our usage is very light (maybe one query every
fe
Hmm, I already boost certain fields, but from what I know about it you
would need to know the boost value ahead of time which is not possible
as it would be a different boost for each document depending on how it
was rated..
I did think of one thing though. If I had a field that had a value of
1-
Thanks, I didn't know there was so much research in this area.
Most of the papers at those workshops are about tuning the
entire ranking algorithm with machine learning techniques.
I am interested in adding one more feature, click data, to an
existing ranking algorithm. In my case, I have enough d
This may not be practical, as it would involve re-indexing
all your documents periodically, but here goes anyway...
You could think about *index-time* boosts. Somewhere
you keep a record of the recommendations, then re-index
your corpus adding some suitable boost to each field in
your document bas
I am not super familiar with the lucene/solr spell checking
implementations, but here is my take:
By saying to only allow more popular, you are restricting suggestions to
only those that have a higher instance frequency in the index. The score
is still by edit distance, but only terms with a h
Let me try that again. I think my email client is going nuts:
I am not super familiar with the lucene/solr spell checking
implementations, but here is my take:
By saying to only allow more popular, you are restricting suggestions to
only those that have a higher instance frequency in the inde
Re-indexing so much would be a pretty big pain. I do have a unique
ID for each document though that I use for updating them every day as
they change.
-Reece
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> This may not be practical, as it would involve re-indexing
> all your document
Thanks for this lucid explanation.
Indeed, turning the option off seems to give more intelligent results. I
think that this was more of an example of me seeing "onlyMorePopular"
and thinking "hmm, that must be good!" without fully understanding the
consequences of the setting.
The key point in y
>
> i'm not using tomcat, i'm using the default jetty setup that comes with
> solr. i grepped through the entire solr installation for 'INFO' but i don't
> see it.
>
> i don't really know anything about jetty other than i have to run java -jar
> start.jar to get it to run solr.
>
>
If you are not
Okay, so what if I added a "rating" field users could update from like
1-5, and then did something like this:
/solr/select?indent=on&debugQuery=on&rows=99&q=body:+something AND
type:I _val_:product(score, rating); _val_ desc, id desc
Would that sort the resultset by the product of the score and t
We got the following background_merge_hit_exception during optimization:
exception:
)background_merge_hit_exception__4zsgC136887658__50nfC995992__51i9C995977__52d5C995968__537yC995999__54xmC1892345__54xlC99593_into__54xn_optimize__javaioIOException_background_merge_hit_exception__4zsgC136887658__5
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 12:12 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
> Do you think it's normal to have warmupTime : 0 ??
Sure, if the caches were empty or almost empty (say on startup).
-Yonik
This usually represents anything less then 8ms if you are on a Windows
system. The granularity on timing on Windows systems is around 16ms.
-Todd feak
-Original Message-
From: sunnyfr [mailto:johanna...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:13 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
Hi,
I didn't look into this deeply, but you didn't say which version of Solr you
are using (looks like it might be 1.3). If using a nightly build is an option,
you might try that instead - Yonik updated the Lucene jars recently and that
might be enough to solve this problem.
Otis
--
Sematext
Reece,
Solr does have the ability to read custom field values from an external file.
This is suitable for cases where these values change a lot. You might want to
consider that instead of updating the index.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original
Jacob Singh wrote:
This is really cool! I've also been working pretty hard at an
automated benchmark suite using jmeter, rightscale and amazon web
services. Next time I'm in Boston (March I think), it would be great
to show you.
That sounds excellent! One problem with Solr's efficiency is tha
Thanks, Jarek.
-Mike
On 29-Jan-09, at 12:20 AM, Jarek Zgoda wrote:
Added appriopriate amendment to FAQ, but I'd consider reorganizing
information in the whole wiki, like creating a section titled
"Common Tasks". Bit of redundancy does not hurt if it comes to
documentation.
Wiadomość nap
Agreed, it seems that a lot of the algorithms in these papers would
almost be a whole new RequestHandler ala Dismax. Luckily a lot of them
seem to be built on Lucene (at least the ones that I looked at that
had code samples).
Which papers did you see that actually talked about using clicks?
"A Decision Theoretic Framework for Ranking using Implicit Feedback"
uses clicks, but the best part of that paper is all the side comments
about difficulties in evaluation. For example, if someone clicks on
three results, is that three times as good or two failures and a
success? We have to know th
Yeah that is an option.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Gregg Donovan wrote:
> Noble,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. The unfortunate thing is that we really don't
> know ahead of time what sort of replication delay we're going to encounter
> -- it could be one millisecond or it could be one hou
54 matches
Mail list logo
