Re: solr search

2008-05-16 Thread dharhsana
hi umar, thanks for ur reply ... As per ur sugesstion i have done the search,it perfectly worked well... i have two more question 1) how to delete an id in a solr i tried some example but there is no changes in my index. 2) How to use an Analyzer for querying and indexing, for exampl

RE: solr search

2008-05-16 Thread Tim Mahy
Hi, 1) did you perform a commit after the delete ? 2) in the default schema there are some comments on the different analyzers which should help you get started I think greetings, Tim Van: dharhsana [EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 16 mei 2008 13:56 A

Re: solr search

2008-05-16 Thread Umar Shah
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:26 PM, dharhsana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi umar, thanks for ur reply ... > > As per ur sugesstion i have done the search,it perfectly worked well... > > i have two more question > 1) how to delete an id in a solr > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMes

Re: Commit problems on Solr 1.2 with Tomcat

2008-05-16 Thread Yonik Seeley
Don't rely on looking at the files in the index directory to tell if an optimize has been performed. http://www.nabble.com/what%27s-up-with%3A-java--Ddata%3Dargs--jar-post.jar-%22%3Coptimize-%3E%22-to16162870.html#a16179673 -Yonik On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Eason. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Searching "inside of words"

2008-05-16 Thread Daniel Löfquist
Sorry for taking forever to reply but anyway... We're using Solr-1.2.0 and can't for various reasons use the Nightly-version. The 1.2.0-version doesn't have NGramFilterFactory and EdgeNGramFilterFactory so the only ones I can utilize are EdgeNGramTokenizerFactory and NGramTokenizerFactory. I

hi umar

2008-05-16 Thread dharhsana
hi,thank u for ur reply.. As per ur suggestion ,the index has been deleted ,can you plz help me out for deleting the index by 'ID' (but not the whole index). For analyzer,i have given the text as the fileld name ,but i didnt get the proper loose search can u give me some more examples for

RE: hi umar

2008-05-16 Thread Tim Mahy
Hi, you can send a delete query, the delete query is the same syntax as a normal search. so if your id field is called "ID" you can send as query : ID:"1450" instead of *:* (which deletes everything) which will delete in this example the document with id 1450 greetings, Tim __

bitwise comparer

2008-05-16 Thread Tim Mahy
Hi all, is there any already existing patch or feature which allows to search bitwise ? so like you would do in mysql : " myField & 5 " which returns in this case all the documents which have myField values 4 and 1 ? greetings, Tim Please see our disclaimer, http://www.infosupport.be/Pages/

Re: bitwise comparer

2008-05-16 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Nope, not that I know of. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message > From: Tim Mahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" > Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:34:08 AM > Subject: bitwise comparer > > Hi all, > > is there any a

Multicore capability: dynamically creating 1000s of cores?

2008-05-16 Thread James Brady
Hi, there was some talk on JIRA about whether Multicore would be able to manage tens of thousands of cores, and dynamically create hundreds every day: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-350? focusedCommentId=12571282#action_12571282 The issue of multicore configuration was left open

Re: Multi core weight

2008-05-16 Thread Jae Joo
Running multiple indivisual queries is one option, but because of the volume of documents (14 millions) and traffic, 10 request per second, I am looking the optimal way to do that. Thanks, Jae On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Otis Gospodnetic < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jae, > It sounds like

Re: Multi core weight

2008-05-16 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Jae, Those numbers are not huge for modern type hardware. Are you actually seeing performance problems? That said, if you are simply spreading your 1 index on 1 server over N cores on the same 1 server, and that's what it sounds like, I am not sure if you are really benefiting. Otis -- Semate

Re: SOLR-470 & default value in schema with NOW (update)

2008-05-16 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The problem appeared for me any time I tried to mix using the default : value NOW with any documents that had this data. That should be a 2 : document set to recreate the problem if it is the case. I didn't try : that hard to isolate the problem, I just changed my data and removed the : defa

Re: Field Filtering that Varies per Query

2008-05-16 Thread Chris Hostetter
: The application that I am working on contains a directory of user : profiles that acts a lot like a social networking site. Each user : profile is composed of a set of fields (first_name, last_name, bio, : phone_number, etc). Every user profile field is associated with a : privacy setting that o

Re: [poll] Change logging to SLF4J?

2008-05-16 Thread Ken Krugler
Hoss has shamed me into taking a position on this. I didn't vote earlier, because I have no real experience with SLF4J, other than indirectly via our use of Jetty. But I do know that we'd have to do _something_ for logging when we switch to embedded Solr. Under the hood we now use Log4J eve