hi umar, thanks for ur reply ...
As per ur sugesstion i have done the search,it perfectly worked well...
i have two more question
1) how to delete an id in a solr
i tried some example but there is no changes in my index.
2) How to use an Analyzer for querying and indexing, for exampl
Hi,
1) did you perform a commit after the delete ?
2) in the default schema there are some comments on the different analyzers
which should help you get started I think
greetings,
Tim
Van: dharhsana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 16 mei 2008 13:56
A
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:26 PM, dharhsana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> hi umar, thanks for ur reply ...
>
> As per ur sugesstion i have done the search,it perfectly worked well...
>
> i have two more question
> 1) how to delete an id in a solr
>
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMes
Don't rely on looking at the files in the index directory to tell if
an optimize has been performed.
http://www.nabble.com/what%27s-up-with%3A-java--Ddata%3Dargs--jar-post.jar-%22%3Coptimize-%3E%22-to16162870.html#a16179673
-Yonik
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Eason. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sorry for taking forever to reply but anyway...
We're using Solr-1.2.0 and can't for various reasons use the
Nightly-version.
The 1.2.0-version doesn't have NGramFilterFactory and
EdgeNGramFilterFactory so the only ones I can utilize are
EdgeNGramTokenizerFactory and NGramTokenizerFactory.
I
hi,thank u for ur reply..
As per ur suggestion ,the index has been deleted ,can you plz help me out
for deleting the index by 'ID' (but not the whole index).
For analyzer,i have given the text as the fileld name ,but i didnt get the
proper loose search
can u give me some more examples for
Hi,
you can send a delete query, the delete query is the same syntax as a normal
search.
so if your id field is called "ID"
you can send as query : ID:"1450" instead of *:* (which deletes everything)
which will delete in this example the document with id 1450
greetings,
Tim
__
Hi all,
is there any already existing patch or feature which allows to search bitwise ?
so like you would do in mysql : " myField & 5 "
which returns in this case all the documents which have myField values 4 and 1 ?
greetings,
Tim
Please see our disclaimer, http://www.infosupport.be/Pages/
Nope, not that I know of.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Tim Mahy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 11:34:08 AM
> Subject: bitwise comparer
>
> Hi all,
>
> is there any a
Hi, there was some talk on JIRA about whether Multicore would be able
to manage tens of thousands of cores, and dynamically create hundreds
every day:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-350?
focusedCommentId=12571282#action_12571282
The issue of multicore configuration was left open
Running multiple indivisual queries is one option, but because of the volume
of documents (14 millions) and traffic, 10 request per second, I am looking
the optimal way to do that.
Thanks,
Jae
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jae,
> It sounds like
Jae,
Those numbers are not huge for modern type hardware. Are you actually seeing
performance problems?
That said, if you are simply spreading your 1 index on 1 server over N cores on
the same 1 server, and that's what it sounds like, I am not sure if you are
really benefiting.
Otis
--
Semate
: The problem appeared for me any time I tried to mix using the default
: value NOW with any documents that had this data. That should be a 2
: document set to recreate the problem if it is the case. I didn't try
: that hard to isolate the problem, I just changed my data and removed the
: defa
: The application that I am working on contains a directory of user
: profiles that acts a lot like a social networking site. Each user
: profile is composed of a set of fields (first_name, last_name, bio,
: phone_number, etc). Every user profile field is associated with a
: privacy setting that o
Hoss has shamed me into taking a position on this.
I didn't vote earlier, because I have no real experience with SLF4J,
other than indirectly via our use of Jetty.
But I do know that we'd have to do _something_ for logging when we
switch to embedded Solr.
Under the hood we now use Log4J eve
15 matches
Mail list logo