Hi,
Due some requirement I need to transform the user queries before passing it
to the standard handler in Solr, can anyone suggest me the best way to do
this.
I will need to use a transfomation class that would provide functions to
process the input query 'qIn' and transform it to the resultant
Hi Umar,
You may be able to preprocess your request parameter in your
servlet filter. In the doFilter() method, you do:
ServletRequest myRequest = new MyServletRequestWrapper( request );
:
chain.doFilter( myRequest, response );
And you have MyServletRequestWrapper that extends ServletRequest
Hello folks,
My project requires having the same content (mostly) in multiple languages.
Do I need to have different files for the same content in different
languages? This will need indexing of every file whenever a new content
appears?
Or can we have a mapping of the content with all ot
I would look toward some implementations:
1st: You could have one index for each language. Just record the preferred
language in session and use it to select the index you are searching in.
Pros: It is easy to add a new language, just create put another index
instance online.
Cons:It can become e
Just continuing on my quest.
How difficult it would be to make a RequestHandler that understands a given
soap request?
2008/5/9 Alexander Ramos Jardim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks,
>
> > To maybe save you from reinventing the wheel, when I asked a similar
> > question a couple weeks back, hossma
thanks all,
they were all valuable information .
btw: is there any e-book on Solr ?
many thanks,
ak
> Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 13:45:05 -0700
> Subject: Re: Solr hardware specs
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> And use a log
On Mon, 12 May 2008 16:16:28 +0530
"Sachit P. Menon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My project requires having the same content (mostly) in multiple languages.
hi Sachit,
please search the archives of the list. this topic seems to come up twice a
week or thereabouts :)
You are of course encoura
On May 12, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
How difficult it would be to make a RequestHandler that understands
a given
soap request?
I would implement this at the servlet API layer (or rather some SOAP
toolkit, like Axis)... and wire in to Solr's API there.
Erik
So,
Wouldn't you use a SoapRequestHandler? Would you use SolrJ to make the
wiring? Or would you put the SOAP on the solr server side?
2008/5/12 Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On May 12, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
>
> > How difficult it would be to make a RequestHandle
On May 12, 2008, at 9:18 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
Wouldn't you use a SoapRequestHandler?
First of all, *I* wouldn't really want to be caught coding up any
kind of client or server SOAP call to Solr. Seems mostly ridiculous
to me when Solr's response is malleable to practically any
Hi Mike,
Thanx for your reply. I have got the answer to the question posted.
I know people are donating time here. ASAP doesnt mean that am demanding
them to reply fast. Please read the lines before you comment something(*Please
kindly* reply ASAP). Am a newbie and with curiosity i have requested
Erik,
Thanks for the comments. But they raised some doubts in my mind.
What I need to do is to integrate Solr to an environment that communicates
via wsdl/SOAP. There will be lots of web services communicating to Solr.
Solr will be used like a web service, so I need to make possible for the
other
Performance wise, it would be best for your web services to communicate to
Solr using SolrJ. I'm sure it would be better performance-wise than SOAP and
you won't need to do anything custom with Solr. If you're using, Solr 1.3,
you can have a *huge* performance boost by using the BinaryResponseParse
On May 12, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
I understood what you said about putting the SOAP at Solr. I agree.
That's
not smart.
Now, I am thinking about the web service talking with an embedded Solr
server.
Is that you were talking about?
Quite pleasantly you don't even real
Nice.
I will try that with Solr-1.3 as Shalin suggests.
2008/5/12 Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On May 12, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Alexander Ramos Jardim wrote:
>
> > I understood what you said about putting the SOAP at Solr. I agree.
> > That's
> > not smart.
> > Now, I am thinking about the
Hi Hoss,
* 1) Posting the exact same question twice because you didn't get a reply in
the first 8 hours isn't going to encourage people to reply faster. best
case scenerio: you waste people's time they could be spending reading
another email; worst case scnerio: you irk people and put them in a ba
On May 10, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I've been digging around in multicore and I am curious as to how
to force a
: reload of the sharedLib classloader. I can reload a given core,
which
: instantiates a new SolrResourceLoader for that core, but I want to
be able to
: re
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Koji Sekiguchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Umar,
>
> You may be able to preprocess your request parameter in your
> servlet filter. In the doFilter() method, you do:
>
> ServletRequest myRequest = new MyServletRequestWrapper( request );
Thanks for your respon
ServletRequest and ServletRequestWrapper are part of the Java servlet-api
(not Solr). Basically, Koji is hinting at writing a ServletFilter
implementation (again using servlet-api) and creating a wrapper
ServletRequest which modifies the underlying request params which can then
be used by Solr.
On
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ServletRequest and ServletRequestWrapper are part of the Java servlet-api
> (not Solr). Basically, Koji is hinting at writing a ServletFilter
> implementation (again using servlet-api) and creating a wrapper
> Ser
Shalin Shekhar Mangar write:
ServletRequest and ServletRequestWrapper are part of the Java servlet-api
(not Solr). Basically, Koji is hinting at writing a ServletFilter
implementation (again using servlet-api) and creating a wrapper
ServletRequest which modifies the underlying request params whic
I haven't written one, but I _think_ you could just implement a
QParser that does the transformation. See the LuceneQParser or the
DismaxQParser.
On May 12, 2008, at 4:59 AM, Umar Shah wrote:
Hi,
Due some requirement I need to transform the user queries before
passing it
to the standa
Hi,I have a query similar to: x OR y OR z and i want to know if there is a
way to make sure i get 1 result with x, 1 result with y and one with z ?
Alternatively, is it possible to achieve through facets?
Thanks,
S.
the easy answer is: x AND y AND z . This will return ALL the documents
containing x,y and z. But if you want also get the documents containin
AT LEAST one of the three, try this:
(x AND y AND z)^10 OR (x OR y OR z)
(the idea is boosting the AND query)
this way, the documents that "x and y
You'll *not* write a servlet. You'll write implement the Filter interface
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/servlet/Filter.html
In the doFilter method, you'll create a ServletRequestWrapper which changes
the incoming param. Then you'll call chain.doFilter with the new request
obj
Thanks for the advice. Unfortunately, my plan was to two have two instances
both running as "masters" although one would only be a warm-standby for
querying purposes. I just wanted a little bit of redundancy for the moment
and I though a true master-slave setup would be overkill. Is it really
probl
Hi all,
one possible use case could be to synchronize the index against a given
database. E.g., assume that you have a filesystem that is indexed
periodically. If files are deleted on this filesystem, they will not be
deleted in the index. This way, you can get (e.g.) the complete content
fro
Glad to hear it. Incidentally, lowering maxBufferedDocs will reduce
peak memory consumption during indexing, at a cost of slower indexing
throughput.
-Mike
On 11-May-08, at 3:41 AM, Tracy Flynn wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
For a completely different reason, I happened to look at the me
On 12-May-08, at 9:31 AM, s d wrote:
Hi,I have a query similar to: x OR y OR z and i want to know if
there is a
way to make sure i get 1 result with x, 1 result with y and one with
z ?
The easiest way is to execute three separate queries:
+x y z
x +y z
x y +z
-Mike
Hi Marc,
Think about how one would go about implementing a manual database table to
table synchronization. It may not be a good idea to iterate all rows from
the target database and checking for existence in the source database to
remove rows which were deleted in the source table. The best way to
I'm experienced with Lucene, less so than SOLR. I am looking at two
systems built on top of SOLR for a library discovery service:
blacklight and vufind.
I checked the raw lucene index using Luke and noticed that both of
these indexes have single character terms in the index, such as "d" o
Just to know it, what where the thresholds were u got the exception? ( I
want to know the order of magnitude, i know it depends on the machine
and the config, but is just to know have an approximate idea).
Thanks
Pako
Marc Bechler wrote:
Hi all,
one possible use case could be to synchronize
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Naomi Dushay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I'm now asking: why would SOLR want single character terms?
Solr, like Lucene, can be configured however you want. The example
schema is just that - an example.
But, there are many field types that might be intereste
Hi,
I'm new to Solr and I've been attempting to get JMX monitoring
working. I can get simple information by using the -
Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote command line switch, but I'd like to get
more useful statistics. I've been working on applying the SOLR-256 and
jmx patch, but the original
Hello,
Before making a little program to extract the txt from my pdfs and feed it
into solr with xml, I just wanted to check if solr has capability to digest
pdf files apart from xml?
Best Regards,
-C.B.
Solr does not have this support built in, but there's a patch for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-284
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Cam Bazz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Before making a little program to extract the txt from my pdfs and feed it
> into solr with xml,
In general, AND will perform better than OR (because of skipping in
the scorers). But if the number of documents matching the AND is
close to that matching the OR query, then skipping doesn't gain you
much and probably has a little more overhead.
-Yonik
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:04 AM, Lars Kott
Thanks for the clarification. The behaviour I'm seeing is that OR queries are
almost *twice* as performant as AND queries, so that's probably down to my
specific setup/data. I'll try to investigate further.
Lars
On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:35:00 -0400
"Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In ge
We have a table that has roughly 1M rows.
If we run a query against the table and order by a string field that has a
large number of unique values then subsequent commits of any other document
takes much longer.
If we don't run the query or if we order on a string field with very few
unique value
This was answered yesterday on the list:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-exceeded-limit-of-maxWarmingSearchers-p17165631.html
regards,
-Mike
On 12-May-08, at 6:12 PM, David Stevenson wrote:
We have a table that has roughly 1M rows.
If we run a query against the table and order by a string field
Hello. I was wondering if there is a way to get solr to return fields with
the same value for a particular field together. For example I might want to
have all the documents with exactly the same name field all returned next to
each other. Is this possible? Thanks!
--
View this message in context
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:58 PM, oleg_gnatovskiy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello. I was wondering if there is a way to get solr to return fields with
> the same value for a particular field together. For example I might want to
> have all the documents with exactly the same name field all ret
But I don't want the search results to be ranked based on that field. I only
want all the documents with the same value grouped together... The way my
system is set up, most documents will have that field empty. Thus, if Is rot
by it, those documents that have a value will bubble to the top...
Hi Marshall,
I've uploaded a new patch which works off the current trunk. Let me know if
you run into any problems with this.
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Marshall Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm new to Solr and I've been attempting to get JMX monitoring working. I
> can get si
44 matches
Mail list logo
