Re: Get Config / Schema, 1.3-dev Broken?

: add: : : Actually, this seems like a legitimate bug to me ... 1.3 should work fine for people using 1.2 configs, and the links on the admin screen should work for people regardless of their config -- that may be tricky in cases where they register multiple instances of the ShowFileReques

RE: Commit preformance problem

a script for posting large sets (23GB here) http://www.nabble.com/file/p15786630/post3.sh post3.sh -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Commit-preformance-problem-tp15434972p15786630.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: too many open files , is it a leak of handler there?

Yonik, can i ask where can i get the fixed code? or the patch? i can not find it in jira? i am a new here.thank you ^_^ - Original Message - From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 10:53 AM Subject: Re: too many open files , is it a leak of handler the

Re: invalid XML character

I'm pretty sure it's a bad idea :-) I was just explaining why it wasn't really feasible to do on the server side. This particular case came from this solr.py: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-216 By the way, is that going to become the official 1.3 solr python client? It would

Re: invalid XML character

Section 2.2 of the XML spec. Three characters from the 0x00-0x19 block are allowed: 0x09, 0x0A, 0x0D. Annotated version: http://www.xml.com/axml/testaxml.htm Section 2.2 in current official spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#charsets wunder On 3/2/08 6:44 AM, "Brian Whitman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Question regarding Solr ranking

: I am not really clear to what the analysis mode is supposed to give me. It : requires me to specify a field when I specify a query. What does that do? : Also, I don't see anything in the analyzer to explain the weighting of a : particular document. i think what Otis ment is that the analysis too

Re: about the >, < operation in solr

: Neither Lucene nor Solr support those operators. I believe there is or : used to be a way to specify an open begin/end for the range query, but I : don't recall the exact details at the moment. field:[* TO X] ... and field:[A TO *] there is (unfortunately) no mechanism in the QueryParser

Re: Fastest Solr query

: The fastest solr query I can find is any query on unused dynamic field name: : unused_dynamic_field_s:3 : A better ping query would be : : q=unused_dynamic_field_s:3 faster isn't neccessarily better for a ping query ... the goal of a ping query is typically to get a baseline sense of

Re: too many open files , is it a leak of handler there?

2008/3/2 陈亮亮 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yonik, can i ask where can i get the fixed code? or the patch? i can not find > it in jira? i am a new here.thank you ^_^ I committed it to "trunk" (the most current development version in subversion). The most recent nightly build should have it. -Yonik > -

Re: too many open files , is it a leak of handler there?

thanks Yonik - Original Message - From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 9:20 AM Subject: Re: too many open files , is it a leak of handler there? > 2008/3/2 陈亮亮 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Yonik, can i ask where can i get the fixed code? or the patch? i

Re: How long does optimize take on your Solr installation?

On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:02:21 -0500 "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Walter Underwood > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Good point. My numbers are from a full rebuild. Let's collect maximum > > times, to keep it simple. --wunder > > You may see more v

Re: Redirect the solr request to the two diffrent folders

Not sure what problem you're trying to solve but this can be achieved using MultiCore support in the Solr 1.3 (under development). Look at http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore for more details. On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 9:11 AM, wkwickramanayake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi...All... > I'm h

Re: what's the schedule of the release of solr 1.3?

I would like to propose a milestone or a beta build to make our lives easier. On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:35 AM, Lance Norskog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An alternative would be for someone to give a subversion checkout number > against 1.3-dev which represents a solid working checkout. > > There

Re: what's the schedule of the release of solr 1.3?

+1 Even if it is not a release , if we can have a milestone build (not a release) we can start our QA on that. We can do without all the latest and greatest features (distributed search etc) . At present, it is a rapidly moving target against which we need to work --Noble On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 1

Re: what's the schedule of the release of solr 1.3?

: Even if it is not a release , if we can have a milestone build (not a : release) we can start our QA on that. : We can do without all the latest and greatest features (distributed : search etc) . I don't really understand this sentiment. Anyone is free to create any builds they want at any p