2008/3/2 陈亮亮 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yonik, can i ask where can i get the fixed code? or the patch? i can not find > it in jira? i am a new here.thank you ^_^
I committed it to "trunk" (the most current development version in subversion). The most recent nightly build should have it. -Yonik > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > > > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 10:53 AM > Subject: Re: too many open files , is it a leak of handler there? > > > >I just committed a fix for this. > > Thanks for tracking this down! > > > > -Yonik > > > > 2008/2/29 陈亮亮 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> ok i have compared the DirectSolrConnection .java and > SolrDispatchFilter.java, and found that the DirecSolrConnection really do not > call the req.colse() as SolrDispatchFilter do, which is said to free the > resources. i guess it is the leak of handlers,i will try and see.^_^ > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "陈亮亮" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > >> Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 4:51 PM > >> Subject: too many open files , is it a leak of handler there? > >> > >> > >> > when embeded the solr in my application last night, i encountered > the too many open file exception just like that said in > "http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200702.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]". And i used DirectSolrConnection to integrate solr with my > application. > >> > > >> > > >> > I debuged when solr doing search, and i found that every time solr > had a query search done the refcount will increase one. I know solr use > refcount to keep reasher safe close, but should it be +1 when solr doing > search and -1( it is to say call decref()) after search done? or else when > commit take place it just decrease the refcount by 1, and the refount still>1 > and searcher not really close, which leads to the hanging of the handlers and > finally the too many open files problem. Is it a bug? or i should not use the > DirectSolrConnection? > >> > > >> > By the way the "ulimit -n 10000" not work out in my case, it just > delay the time. i use the "lsof |grep solr| wc -l" to monitor the handler, it > keeps increasing, i think it is a leak of handler here. > >> > > >> > Any help would appreciated, thank you !!! > >
