On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 08:55 +0200, Brian Carmalt wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I run Solr on Tomcat under windows and use the tomcat monitor to start
> the service. I have set the minimum heap
> size to be 512MB and then maximum to be 1024mb. The system has 2 Gigs of
> ram. The error that I get afte
Dear all,
We are running an appalication built using SOLR, now we are trying to build
a tagging system using the existing SOLR indexed field called
"tag_keywords", this field has different keywords seperated by comma, please
give suggestions on how can we build tagging system using this field?
Th
Moin Thorsten,
I am using Solr 1.2.0. I'll try the svn version out and see of that helps.
Thanks,
Brian
Which version do you use of solr?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/solr/trunk/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/XmlUpdateRequestHandler.java?view=markup
The trunk version of the XmlUpdate
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 12:59 +0530, Doss wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We are running an appalication built using SOLR, now we are trying to build
> a tagging system using the existing SOLR indexed field called
> "tag_keywords", this field has different keywords seperated by comma, please
> give suggestio
Hallo again,
I checked out the solr source and built the 1.3-dev version and then I
tried to index the same file to the new server.
I do get a different exception trace, but the result is the same.
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Arrays.java:2882)
a
Hi all,
i try to add/update documents with
the python solr.py api.
Everything works fine so far
but if i try to add a documents which contain
German Umlaute (ö,ä,ü, ...) i got errors.
Maybe someone has an idea how i could convert
my data?
Should i post this to JIRA?
Thanks for help.
Btw: I ha
Hallo Christian,
Try it with title.encode('utf-8').
As in: kw =
{'id':'12','title':title.encode('utf-8'),'system':'plone','url':'http://www.google.de'}
Christian Klinger schrieb:
Hi all,
i try to add/update documents with
the python solr.py api.
Everything works fine so far
but if i try to
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:26 +0200, Brian Carmalt wrote:
> Hallo again,
>
> I checked out the solr source and built the 1.3-dev version and then I
> tried to index the same file to the new server.
> I do get a different exception trace, but the result is the same.
>
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError:
On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:29 AM, Doss wrote:
We are running an appalication built using SOLR, now we are trying
to build
a tagging system using the existing SOLR indexed field called
"tag_keywords", this field has different keywords seperated by
comma, please
give suggestions on how can we build
The snapinstaller script opens a new searcher by calling commit. From the
attached debug output it looks like that actually worked:
+ /opt/solr/bin/commit
+ [[ 0 != 0 ]]
+ logExit ended 0
Try running the /opt/solr/bin/commit directly with the -V option.
Bill
On 9/5/07, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PRO
Hi all,
I am curious whether somebody has written a rss plugin for solr.
The idea is to provide a rss syndication link for the current search.
It should be really easy to implement since it would be just a
transformation solrXml -> RSS which easily can be done with a simple
xsl.
Has somebody a
perhaps:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-208
in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/example/solr/conf/xslt/
check:
example_atom.xsl
example_rss.xsl
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Hi all,
I am curious whether somebody has written a rss plugin for solr.
The idea is to prov
That is very strange. Even if there is something wrong with the config or
code, the static HTML contained in distributiondump.jsp should show up.
Are you using the latest version of the JSP? There has been a recent fix:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-333
Bill
On 9/5/07, Matthew Run
Hi,
I'm actually facing a issues reguarding a process on our Solr Webapp
We currently reindexe all document every X days since our stopwords
and synonyms list are very often edited and since we use
stopwordFilter and SynFilter at index time.
For that process, I wrote a Ant script that do somethi
Hi,
We have the example solr installed with jetty.
We are able to navigate to the solr/admin page, but when we try to
POST an xml document via the command line, there is a fatal error. It
seems that the solr/update servlet isnt running, giving a http 400
error.
does anyone have any clue what is
: We are able to navigate to the solr/admin page, but when we try to
: POST an xml document via the command line, there is a fatal error. It
: seems that the solr/update servlet isnt running, giving a http 400
: error.
a 400 could mean a lot of things ... what is the full HTTP response you
get ba
oops, sorry, its says "missing content stream"
as far as logs go: i have a request log, didn't find anything with
stack traces though. where is it? we're using the example one packaged
with solr.
"GET /solr/update HTTP/1.1" 400 1401
just to make sure, i typed "java -jar post.jar solrfile.xml"
th
Well, I do get...
Distribution Info
Master Server
No distribution info present
...
But there appears to be no information filled in.
++
| Matthew Runo
| Zappos Development
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 702-943-7833
+-
Now I'm curious: what is the use case for documents this large?
Thanks,
Lance Norskog
The thing is that a new searcher is not opened if I look in the
stats.jsp page. The index version never changes.
When I run..
sudo /opt/solr/bin/commit -V -u tomcat5
..I get a new searcher opened, but even though it (in theory)
installed the new index, I see no docs in there. During the
s
On a related note, it'd be great if we could set up a series of
transformations to be done on data when it comes into the index,
before being indexed. I guess a custom tokenizer might be the best
way to do this though..?
ie:
-Post
-Data is cleaned up, properly escaped, etc
-Then data is pa
I researched this problem before. The problem I found is that Python strings
are not Unicode by default. You have to do something to make them Unicode.
Here are the links I found:
http://www.reportlab.com/i18n/python_unicode_tutorial.html
http://evanjones.ca/python-utf8.html
http://jjinux.blog
On 9/6/07, Brian Carmalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try it with title.encode('utf-8').
> As in: kw =
> {'id':'12','title':title.encode('utf-8'),'system':'plone','url':'http://www.google.de'}
It seems like the client library should be responsible for encoding,
not the user.
So try changing
title=
Hi,
I recently upgraded to Solr 1.2. I've set it up through Tomcat using
context fragment files. I deploy using the tomcat web manager. In the
context fragment I set the environment variable solr/home. This use
to work as expected. The solr/home value pointed to the directory
where "data"
I don't use the java client, but when I switched to 1.2, I'd get that
message when I forget to add the content type header, as described in
CHANGES.txt
> 9. The example solrconfig.xml maps /update to XmlUpdateRequestHandler using
the new request dispatcher (SOLR-104). This requires posted co
It works for me. (fragments with solr 1.2 on tomcat 5.5.20)
Could you post your fragment file?
Tom
On 9/6/07, Matt Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded to Solr 1.2. I've set it up through Tomcat using
> context fragment files. I deploy using the tomcat web manager.
On 9/6/07, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The thing is that a new searcher is not opened if I look in the
> stats.jsp page. The index version never changes.
The index version is read from the index... hence if the lucene index
doesn't change (even if a ew snapshot was taken), the versio
Here you go:
crossContext="true" >
This is the same file I'm putting into the Tomcat manager "XML
Configuration file URL" form input.
Matt
On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Tom Hill wrote:
It works for me. (fragments with solr 1.2 on tomcat 5.5.20)
Could you post your fragment file?
Tom
On 6-Sep-07, at 12:13 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On 9/6/07, Brian Carmalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Try it with title.encode('utf-8').
As in: kw =
{'id':'12','title':title.encode
('utf-8'),'system':'plone','url':'http://www.google.de'}
It seems like the client library should be responsible fo
Well, I've been playing around with it (removed all the snapshots,
restarted tomcat) and it seems like it works now.. maybe.
I was noticing that search2 and search3, the slaves, had searchers
that had been opened several days ago - when we do several 100
commits and 2 optimizes on search1,
Hi all.
I'm trying to construct a query that in pseudo-code would read
like this:
field != ''
I'm finding it difficult to write this as a solr query, though.
Stuff like:
NOT field:()
doesn't seem to do the trick.
any ideas?
dw
On 9/6/07, David Whalen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm trying to construct a query that in pseudo-code would read
> like this:
>
> field != ''
>
> I'm finding it difficult to write this as a solr query, though.
> Stuff like:
>
> NOT field:()
>
> doesn't seem to do the trick.
>
> any i
On 6-Sep-07, at 2:26 AM, Brian Carmalt wrote:
Hallo again,
I checked out the solr source and built the 1.3-dev version and
then I tried to index the same file to the new server.
I do get a different exception trace, but the result is the same.
Note that StringBuilder expands capacity by al
I am pretty new to Solr and this is my first post to this list so please
forgive me if I make any glaring errors.
Here's my problem. When I do a search using the Solr admin interface for
a term that I know does not exist in my index the QTime is about 1ms.
However, if I add facets to the searc
On 9/6/07, Aaron Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am pretty new to Solr and this is my first post to this list so please
> forgive me if I make any glaring errors.
>
> Here's my problem. When I do a search using the Solr admin interface for
> a term that I know does not exist in my index the
Dear Solr Users:
Is it possible to index documents directly without going through any
XML/HTTP bridge?
I have a large collection (10^7 documents, some very large) and indexing
speed is a concern.
Thanks!
--Renaud
There are couple choices, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolJava
- Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Renaud Waldura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 2:21 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Non-HTTP Indexing
>
>
> Dear Solr Users:
>
> Is
On 9/6/07, Renaud Waldura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to index documents directly without going through any
> XML/HTTP bridge?
> I have a large collection (10^7 documents, some very large) and indexing
> speed is a concern.
Where are these documents currently stored, and in what fo
Thank-you for your response, this does shed some light on the subject.
Our basic question was why were we seeing slower responses the smaller
our result set got.
Currently we are searching about 1.2 million documents with the source
document about 2KB, but we do duplicate some of the data. I bump
On 6-Sep-07, at 3:16 PM, Aaron Hammond wrote:
Thank-you for your response, this does shed some light on the subject.
Our basic question was why were we seeing slower responses the smaller
our result set got.
Currently we are searching about 1.2 million documents with the source
document about 2
On 6-Sep-07, at 3:25 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
There are essentially two facet computation strategies:
1. cached bitsets: a bitset for each term is generated and
intersected with the query restul bitset. This is more general and
performs well up to a few thousand terms.
2. field enumeratio
HI,
I am wondering that is there any way for CACHING FACETS SEARCH Result?
I have 13 millions and have facets by states (50). If there is a mechasim to
chche, I may get faster result back.
Thanks,
Jae
Hi,
I'm having trouble getting a field of type SortableFloatField to not
weigh into to the relevancy score returned for a document.
So far I've tried boosting the field to 0.0 at index time using this
field type - and also implemented a custom Similarity implementation
that overrode lengthNorm(
On Sep 6, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Matthew Runo wrote:
On a related note, it'd be great if we could set up a series of
transformations to be done on data when it comes into the index,
before being indexed. I guess a custom tokenizer might be the best
way to do this though..?
ie:
-Post
-Data is
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 09:07 -0400, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> perhaps:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-208
>
> in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/example/solr/conf/xslt/
>
> check:
> example_atom.xsl
> example_rss.xsl
Awesome.
Thanks very much Ryan to point me into th
Matt - hey!
In your Solr console, which of these three messages do you see?
* log.info("JNDI not configured for Solr
(NoInitialContextEx)");
* log.info("No /solr/home in JNDI");
* log.warning("Odd RuntimeException while testing for JNDI: "
+ ex.getM
On 9/6/07, Bart Smyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having trouble getting a field of type SortableFloatField to not
> weigh into to the relevancy score returned for a document.
>
> sortMissingLast="true" omitNorms="true"/>
>
> So far I've tried boosting the field to 0.0 at index time using thi
On 9/6/07, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 13 millions and have facets by states (50). If there is a mechasim to
> chche, I may get faster result back.
How fast are you getting results back with standard field faceting
(facet.field=state)?
Hi all.
Wildcard cannot be used for field name by specifying query though storage
in index is possible according to the specification of wildcard by
dynamic field.
I want to use wildcard to specify field name at query.
Please teach something a good idea.
The following images.
--document
49 matches
Mail list logo
