Hi,
I don't know if solr can manage grouping. But you can do it using an XSLT
stylesheet:
http://www.jenitennison.com/xslt/grouping/muenchian.html
Hope it helps :)
On 1/2/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it possible to group the results from a solr query? I have indexed
the c
thanks. Yes, the presentation layer could group results, but that is
not practical if i want to show the first 20 results out of 200,000
matches.
Nutch groups the results by site. Any idea how they do it?
thanks
ryan
On 1/3/07, Ricardo Borillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 02:16 +, Edward Garrett wrote:
> thorsten,
>
> see the following for discussion. your case is indeed an annoyance--the
> thread below discusses motivations for it and ways of working around it. (i
> too confess that i wish it were not so.)
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com
for what it's worth, i wrote a recursive template in xsl that replaces the
escaped characters with actual elements. here, the variable $val would be
the tag, e.g. "em". this has been working okay for me so far.
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 12:06 +, Edward Garrett wrote:
> for what it's worth, i wrote a recursive template in xsl that replaces the
> escaped characters with actual elements. here, the variable $val would be
> the tag, e.g. "em". this has been working okay for me so far.
Yeah, many thanks for po
Hi,
Have anybody integrated Solr with Compass yet? Is there any Solr-Compass
integration best practices document? I am new to the Solr so sorry if my
question sounds odd (it may very well be this case).
Thanks,
Lukas
On Jan 3, 2007, at 7:39 AM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
However I still think the highlighter should return unescaped tags for
highlighting. There is IMO no benefit for the current behavior.
That really isn't practical. Suppose the prefix were ">>" and the
suffix were "<<"? It would return i
On 1/3/07, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However I still think the highlighter should return unescaped tags for
highlighting. There is IMO no benefit for the current behavior.
The problems all stem from the simple highlighter formatter mixing
highlighting info directly into the s
Based on a chat with an early adopter of Flare, we decided to split
out the Ruby-Solr DSL sooner rather than later. I've pulled out the
library code into a separate directory under client/ruby/solrb ("rb"
being the standard Ruby file extension). Info for this library is here:
On 1/3/07, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thanks. Yes, the presentation layer could group results, but that is
not practical if i want to show the first 20 results out of 200,000
matches.
Nutch groups the results by site. Any idea how they do it?
Good question.
Off the top of my he
I am trying to run the example in Solr Distribution and can't instantiate
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin.
Her below is the stack trace I get as soon as I instantiate
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin.
I have not set the classpath variable.
I have set JAVA_HOME c:\Java\jdk1.6.0
I have noticed th
Erik:
Thank you for your answer. I think I will be focusing more on the
rails application part. Some random thoughts and questions for
brainstorming .. Some of this questions are really way down .. but I
am trying to understand your roadmap rather ..
1. Are you thinking of any user/password/my p
It looks like the jre is being picked up before the JDK. Put the bin
directory of the JDK in your path first, or use the full path to the
JDK:
c:\Java\jdk1.6.0\bin\java.exe -jar start.jar
-Yonik
On 1/3/07, Jagadish Channagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to run the example in Solr D
Yonik,
I only saw options to specify the default operator (AND|OR) and to
specify similarity. There was nothing for scoring - in case I need to modify
the
scoring. I got the similarity working by creating my own class.
Thanks.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
>
> On 1/2/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>
> : The DisjunctionMaxQuery seems to yield the maximum score only. From my
>
> NOTE: by setting the "tiebreaker" value of a DisjunctionMaxQuery to "1.0"
> it generates the sum of the scores
>
> : understanding, I would
> : need to do the following -
> : (1) Create a
On 1/3/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I only saw options to specify the default operator (AND|OR) and to
specify similarity. There was nothing for scoring - in case I need to modify
the
scoring. I got the similarity working by creating my own class.
If you created your own Similarit
Zaheed,
All great questions. My answers will be vague, since I'm still in
the early stages of how this will work, but I'll provide what I can
below
On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Zaheed Haque wrote:
1. Are you thinking of any user/password/my page/settings what not...
for folksonomy/tagg
What is the syntax to use to specify a search across multiple across fields
in a URL ?
This is in case someone needs to alter the "searchable" fields dynamically
as opposed to
reading them at server startup from "qf" in solrconfig.xml. Also, it is
easier at debug time :)
Thanks.
--
View this m
Thanks Yonik. I will go ahead and try your suggestion.
-Jagadish
On 1/3/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks like the jre is being picked up before the JDK. Put the bin
directory of the JDK in your path first, or use the full path to the
JDK:
c:\Java\jdk1.6.0\bin\java.exe -ja
On 1/3/07, escher2k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the syntax to use to specify a search across multiple across fields
in a URL ?
This is in case someone needs to alter the "searchable" fields dynamically
as opposed to
reading them at server startup from "qf" in solrconfig.xml. Also, it is
e
I've written an unpolished custom fragmenter for highlighting which is
more expensive than the BasicFragmenter that ships with lucene, but
generates more natural candidate fragments (it will tend to produce
beginning/ends of sentences).
Would there be interest in the community in releasing it and
I for one would be interested in such a fragmenter, as the default one
is lacking and doesnt produce acceptable results for most applications.
Michael
Mike Klaas wrote:
I've written an unpolished custom fragmenter for highlighting which is
more expensive than the BasicFragmenter that ships wit
On Jan 3, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Mike Klaas wrote:
I've written an unpolished custom fragmenter for highlighting which is
more expensive than the BasicFragmenter that ships with lucene, but
generates more natural candidate fragments (it will tend to produce
beginning/ends of sentences).
Would there
: > However I still think the highlighter should return unescaped tags for
: > highlighting. There is IMO no benefit for the current behavior.
the advantage is that the XmlResponseWriter has a duty to ensure that it
produces wellformed XML regardless of configuration, data, or input.
: The probl
: specify similarity. There was nothing for scoring - in case I need to modify
: the
: scoring. I got the similarity working by creating my own class.
customer Scorer classes are really only possible via custom Query and
Weight classes -- which are typically way beyond what most people need to
mo
: I've written an unpolished custom fragmenter for highlighting which is
: more expensive than the BasicFragmenter that ships with lucene, but
: generates more natural candidate fragments (it will tend to produce
: beginning/ends of sentences).
:
: Would there be interest in the community in relea
I haven't written any unfortunately. Right now, I have only implemented
custom Similarity - in here, I am trying to alter the scoring substantially
depending on the field. However, I might need to alter the overall
document score - I am in the process of investigating if I can get away
without ha
On 1/3/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I've written an unpolished custom fragmenter for highlighting which is
: more expensive than the BasicFragmenter that ships with lucene, but
: generates more natural candidate fragments (it will tend to produce
: beginning/ends of sentences
: implementing Solr's highlighting. What I'd like to do is improve the
: end-user's experience with highlighting in Solr. If as a result a
: high-quality component for lucene Highlighter is fleshed out, that can
: always be contributed to Lucene later.
:
: Generally, we should strive for a high-
On 1/3/07 5:13 PM, "Mike Klaas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Generally, we should strive for a high-quality out-of-the-box
> highlighting in Solr. That might involve making things like better
> fragmenters and a few other tricks(*) the default setup, and providing
> a "quick & dirty" setting for
Hi,
I am trying to create a linear function to influence the similarity
computation. For example -
if tf = 4, f(tf) = 150 * 1 + 150 * 0.3
= 195
The first occurrence is multiplied by 150. The next three occurrences are
mulitplied by 150 and
divided by 10 (3/10).
Howev
On 1/3/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've implemented this before, once in Python and once in C, so I'd
be glad to take a look at it. I'm not sure I have time to do a lot
of implementation, but I'd sure be glad to help.
Cool. I'll post the current fragmenter as a JIRA issue
Mekin: Yonik has done some brainstorming on ways of supporting "Feterated"
searching across multiple instances of Solr - but the main motivation
there is to deal with homogeneous indexes which are too big to fit on a
single host efficiently...
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FederatedSearch
On 1/3/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We tried several APIs and decided that the best was an array of
String with the odd elements containing the strings that needed
highlighting.
Good idea... the only thing I could think of was an array of start/end
offsets into the string, wh
On 1/3/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is _much_ better than the current system. It wouldn't be hard to
add start/end offsets to the fragments too, as Chris suggested so long
ago.
Or leave room for other info such as weights, or what term matched, etc.
Quite a few aspects of t
On 1/3/07 9:33 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/3/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We tried several APIs and decided that the best was an array of
>> String with the odd elements containing the strings that needed
>> highlighting.
>
> Good idea... the only th
On 1/3/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/3/07 9:33 PM, "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/3/07, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We tried several APIs and decided that the best was an array of
>> String with the odd elements containing the strings t
37 matches
Mail list logo