Re: weird behabiour when setting negative boost with bq using dismax

2010-02-04 Thread Marc Sturlese
>: bq=(*:* -field_a:54^1) >I think what you want there is bq=(*:* -field_a:54)^1 >...you are "boosting" things that don't match "field_a:54" Thanks Hoss. I've updated the Wiki, the content of the bq param was wrong: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRelevancyFAQ#How_do_I_give_a_very_low

Re: weird behabiour when setting negative boost with bq using dismax

2010-02-04 Thread Chris Hostetter
: bq=(*:* -field_a:54^1) I think what you want there is bq=(*:* -field_a:54)^1 ...you are "boosting" things that don't match "field_a:54" adding a boost value "^1" to a negated clause doesn't do much (except maybe make hte queryNorm really wacky) -Hoss

Re: weird behabiour when setting negative boost with bq using dismax

2010-02-04 Thread Marc Sturlese
happen is that results that >> match >> field_a:54 are excluded. Just like doing: >> >> fq=-field_a:54 >> >> Any idea what could be happening? Has anyone experienced this behaviour >> before? >> Thnaks in advance >> -- >> View this message in co

Re: weird behabiour when setting negative boost with bq using dismax

2010-02-03 Thread Lance Norskog
g? Has anyone experienced this behaviour > before? > Thnaks in advance > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/weird-behabiour-when-setting-negative-boost-with-bq-using-dismax-tp27406614p27406614.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com

weird behabiour when setting negative boost with bq using dismax

2010-02-01 Thread Marc Sturlese
work. What seems to happen is that results that match field_a:54 are excluded. Just like doing: fq=-field_a:54 Any idea what could be happening? Has anyone experienced this behaviour before? Thnaks in advance -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/weird-behabiour-when-setting-neg