>Generally speaking, by convention boosts in Lucene have unity at 1.0,
>not 0.0. So, a "negative boost" is usually done with boosts between 0
>and 1. For this case, maybe a boost of 0.00001 is what you want?
I forgot to say I tried what you say aswell but didn't work.

>In the standard query parser, this means "remove all entries in which
>field_a = 54".
>> bq=-field_a:54^10000
In DisMaxQueryParser bq is a boosting function. It should affect the boost
of the results but not the number of it. I think what you mean is:
fq=-field_a:54

Still stuck whit this...




Lance Norskog-2 wrote:
> 
> In the standard query parser, this means "remove all entries in which
> field_a = 54".
> 
>> bq=-field_a:54^10000
> 
> Generally speaking, by convention boosts in Lucene have unity at 1.0,
> not 0.0. So, a "negative boost" is usually done with boosts between 0
> and 1. For this case, maybe a boost of 0.00001 is what you want?
> 
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Marc Sturlese <marc.sturl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I already asked about this long ago but the answer doesn't seem to
>> work...
>> I am trying to set a negative query boost to send the results that match
>> field_a: 54 to a lower position. I have tried it in 2 different ways:
>>
>> bq=(*:* -field_a:54^10000)
>> bq=-field_a:54^10000
>>
>> None of them seem to work. What seems to happen is that results that
>> match
>> field_a:54 are excluded. Just like doing:
>>
>> fq=-field_a:54
>>
>> Any idea what could be happening? Has anyone experienced this behaviour
>> before?
>> Thnaks in advance
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/weird-behabiour-when-setting-negative-boost-with-bq-using-dismax-tp27406614p27406614.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lance Norskog
> goks...@gmail.com
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/weird-behaviour-when-setting-negative-boost-with-bq-using-dismax-tp27406614p27449405.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to