APX=approximately sorry
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 2:09 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/26/2018 9:45 AM, Jeff Courtade wrote:
> > We are considering a move to solr 7.x my question is Must we use cloud?
> We
> > currently do not and all is well. It seems all work is done referencing
> > cloud imple
On 9/26/2018 9:45 AM, Jeff Courtade wrote:
We are considering a move to solr 7.x my question is Must we use cloud? We
currently do not and all is well. It seems all work is done referencing
cloud implementations.
You do not have to use cloud.
For most people who are starting from scratch, I w
t-us
From: Walter Underwood
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 11:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: to cloud or not to cloud
Cloud is very useful if you shard or need near real-time indexing.
For non-sharded, non real time collections, I really like master/slave.
Cloud is very useful if you shard or need near real-time indexing.
For non-sharded, non real time collections, I really like master/slave.
The loose coupling between master and slave makes it trivial to scale
out. Just clone a slave and fire it up.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
h
Hi,
We are considering a move to solr 7.x my question is Must we use cloud? We
currently do not and all is well. It seems all work is done referencing
cloud implementations.
We have
solr 4.3.0 master/slave
14 servers RHEL 32 core 96 gb ram 7 shards one replica per shard
Total index is 333Gb aro
