APX=approximately.... sorry On Wed, Sep 26, 2018, 2:09 PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 9/26/2018 9:45 AM, Jeff Courtade wrote: > > We are considering a move to solr 7.x my question is Must we use cloud? > We > > currently do not and all is well. It seems all work is done referencing > > cloud implementations. > > You do not have to use cloud. > > For most people who are starting from scratch, I would suggest using > SolrCloud. Many many things are just a lot easier with cloud. > > For somebody who has an existing setup that's NOT running cloud, if they > are happy with their setup, I see no reason to change it ... but those > people should at least *investigate* SolrCloud, just to find out whether > it might make their operations easier. > > > solr 4.3.0 master/slave > > 14 servers RHEL 32 core 96 gb ram 7 shards one replica per shard > > Total index is 333Gb around 47.5 GB per server. > > APX 2million docs per shard > > Sharded indexes are a LOT easier in SolrCloud. I have dealt with > sharded indexes without cloud. If SolrCloud had existed when I began > that work, I would have definitely used it. That index might still be > using master/slave, but it was not possible to set up replication > between 1.4.1 and 3.2.0, so master/slave went out the window. > > I have no idea what APX is. > > Thanks, > Shawn > >
