sing that data, sure.
Erik
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/stored-and-
indexed-in-schema-tp16411090p16419438.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
'll get better response in that Solr won't be taking the time to
> retrieve the large stored field, writing it to the response, and the
> client-side parsing that data, sure.
>
> Erik
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/stored-and-indexed-in-schema-tp16411090p16419438.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:56 PM, Vinci wrote:
I would like to ask, if I set a field to be indexed but not stored,
I can
retrieved the document but cannot retrieve this field?
That's correct. By definition :)
If I have large field that I want to index but I am not suppose to
show them
to use
another field in Solr to point to their location...I throw the
retrieval job to the server :P), will I get faster respond even the query
doesn't ask solr to return this large field?
Thank you,
Vinci
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/stored-and-indexed-in-s
