Hi, Thank you for your reply, It look like I will have some benefit but I will also lose the highlighter/summary functionary, it that right?
Thank you, Vinci Erik Hatcher wrote: > > > On Mar 31, 2008, at 11:56 PM, Vinci wrote: >> I would like to ask, if I set a field to be indexed but not stored, >> I can >> retrieved the document but cannot retrieve this field? > > That's correct. By definition :) > >> If I have large field that I want to index but I am not suppose to >> show them >> to user (The origin content stored in another processed document >> where I am >> using another field in Solr to point to their location...I throw the >> retrieval job to the server :P), will I get faster respond even the >> query >> doesn't ask solr to return this large field? > > You'll get better response in that Solr won't be taking the time to > retrieve the large stored field, writing it to the response, and the > client-side parsing that data, sure. > > Erik > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/stored-and-indexed-in-schema-tp16411090p16419438.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
