-user
Subject: Re: Upgrade path from 5.4.1
Yonik:
Yeah, I was justparroting what had been reported I have no data to
back it up personally. I just saw the JIRA that Simon indicated and it
looks like the statement "which are faster on all fronts and use less
memory" is just flat wrong w
Yonik:
Yeah, I was justparroting what had been reported I have no data to
back it up personally. I just saw the JIRA that Simon indicated and it
looks like the statement "which are faster on all fronts and use less
memory" is just flat wrong when it comes to looking up individual
values.
Ya learn
though see SOLR-11078 , which is reporting significant query slowdowns
after converting *Trie to *Point fields in 7.1, compared with 6.4.2
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Erick Erickson
> wrote:
> > I _always_ prefer to reindex if possible.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I _always_ prefer to reindex if possible. Additionally, as of Solr 7
> all the numeric types are deprecated in favor of points-based types
> which are faster on all fronts and use less memory.
They are a good step forward in genera, and fast
I _always_ prefer to reindex if possible. Additionally, as of Solr 7
all the numeric types are deprecated in favor of points-based types
which are faster on all fronts and use less memory. However, to use
this functionality you'll need to re-index anyway.
Solr 7 will still support Trie types, but
Hi Guys,
I just took over the care and feeding of three poor neglected solr 5.4.1 cloud
clusters at my new position. While spinning up new collections and supporting
other business initiatives I am pushing management to give me the green light
on migrating to a newer version of solr. The last
