Thanks guys! I kind of suspected this would be the best route and I'll move forward with a fresh start on 7.x as soon as I can get ops to give me the needed machines! 😊
Best Robi ________________________________ From: Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 8:17:49 AM To: solr-user Subject: Re: Upgrade path from 5.4.1 Yonik: Yeah, I was justparroting what had been reported I have no data to back it up personally. I just saw the JIRA that Simon indicated and it looks like the statement "which are faster on all fronts and use less memory" is just flat wrong when it comes to looking up individual values. Ya learn somethin' new every day. On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 6:57 AM, simon <mtnes...@gmail.com> wrote: > though see SOLR-11078 , which is reporting significant query slowdowns > after converting *Trie to *Point fields in 7.1, compared with 6.4.2 > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > I _always_ prefer to reindex if possible. Additionally, as of Solr 7 >> > all the numeric types are deprecated in favor of points-based types >> > which are faster on all fronts and use less memory. >> >> They are a good step forward in genera, and faster for range queries >> (and multiple-dimensions), but looking at the design I'd guess that >> they may be slower for exact-match queries? >> Has anyone tested this? >> >> -Yonik >> ________________________________ This communication is confidential. Frontier only sends and receives email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.frontier.com/email_disclaimer.
