Hi,
I'd also like a more powerful/generic CopyField.
Today always copies after UpdateChain and before analysis.
Refactoring it as an UP (using SOLR-2370 to include it as part of default
chain) would let us specify before UpdateChain in addition. But how could we
get it to copy after analysis?
: > Maybe copy fields should be refactored to happen in a new, core,
: update processor, so there is nothing special/awkward about them? It
: seems they fit as part of what an update processor is all about,
: augmenting/modifying incoming documents.
:
: Seems reasonable.
: By default, the cop
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Maybe copy fields should be refactored to happen in a new, core, update
> processor, so there is nothing special/awkward about them? It seems they fit
> as part of what an update processor is all about, augmenting/modifying
> incoming docu
Jan,
So you are implying that the fields made by copyField are not processed by
UpdateProcessors, right?
Erik,
Logically this makes sense but then copyField operations must move to
solrconfig.xml?
Editing solrconfig.xml is more challenging than schema.xml, I feel.
Kuro
On 2/23/11 2:09 AM, "Erik
Maybe copy fields should be refactored to happen in a new, core, update
processor, so there is nothing special/awkward about them? It seems they fit
as part of what an update processor is all about, augmenting/modifying incoming
documents.
Erik
On Feb 23, 2011, at 04:40 , Jan Høydahl
This is how I've got it:
A document first passes through the UpdateChain (processors), which is document
centric.
Then copyFields are processed
And finally the analysis in fieldTypes are processed
So you cannot use before UpdateProcessors nor after Analysis :(
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution a
You are right, i misread. Fields a copied first, then analyzed and then behave
like other fields and pass the same way through the update processor.
Cheers,
> Markus,
>
> I searched but I couldn't find a definite answer, so I posted this
> question.
> The article you quoted talks about implemen
Markus,
I searched but I couldn't find a definite answer, so I posted this
question.
The article you quoted talks about implementing a copyField-like operation
using UpdateProcessor. It doesn't talk about relationship between
the copyField operation proper and UpdateProcessors.
Kuro
On 2/22/11
Yes. But did you actually search the mailing list or Solr's wiki? I guess not.
Here it is:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
> Can fields created by copyField instructions be processed by
> UpdateProcessors?
> Or only raw input fields can?
>
> So far my experiment is suggesting
Can fields created by copyField instructions be processed by
UpdateProcessors?
Or only raw input fields can?
So far my experiment is suggesting the latter.
T. "Kuro" Kurosaka
10 matches
Mail list logo
