On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe copy fields should be refactored to happen in a new, core, update > processor, so there is nothing special/awkward about them? It seems they fit > as part of what an update processor is all about, augmenting/modifying > incoming documents.
Seems reasonable. By default, the copyFields could be read from the schema for back compat (and the fact that copyField does feel more natural in the schema) -Yonik http://lucidimagination.com
