> Play hard, but play safe!
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:58:55 +0800
> >> Subject: Re: Unable to perform search query after changing uniqueKey
> >> From: edwinye...@gmail.com
> >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
he server. Lots and lots of good folks have
> tripped over this one.http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_urlencode.asp
> Play hard, but play safe!
>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:58:55 +0800
>> Subject: Re: Unable to perform search query after changing uniqueKey
>> From: edwinye..
folks have tripped over
this one.http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_urlencode.asp
Play hard, but play safe!
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:58:55 +0800
> Subject: Re: Unable to perform search query after changing uniqueKey
> From: edwinye...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Thanks Erick.
Yes, it is able to work correct if I do not use spaces for the field names,
especially for the uniqueKey.
Regards,
Edwin
On 31 March 2015 at 13:58, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I would never put spaces in my field names! Frankly I have no clue
> what Solr does with that, but it can't
I would never put spaces in my field names! Frankly I have no clue
what Solr does with that, but it can't be good. Solr explicitly
supports Java naming conventions, camel case, underscores and numbers.
Special symbols are frowned upon, I never use anything but upper case,
lower case and underscores
Latest information that I've found for this is that the error only occurs
for shard2.
If I do a search for just shard1, those records that are assigned to shard1
will be able to be displayed. Only when I search for shard2 will the
NullPointerException error occurs. Previously I was doing a search
Hi Erick,
I've changed the uniqueKey from id to Item No.
Item No
Below are my definitions for both the id and Item No.
Regards,
Edwin
On 30 March 2015 at 23:05, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Well, let's see the definition of your ID field, 'cause I'm puzzled.
>
> It's definitely A Bad Thing t
Well, let's see the definition of your ID field, 'cause I'm puzzled.
It's definitely A Bad Thing to have it be any kind of tokenized field
though, but that's a shot in the dark.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi Mostafa,
>
> Yes, I've defined all the f
Hi Mostafa,
Yes, I've defined all the fields in schema.xml. It is able to work on the
version without SolrCloud, but it is not working for the one with SolrCloud.
Both of them are using the same schema.xml.
Regards,
Edwin
On 30 March 2015 at 14:34, Mostafa Gomaa wrote:
> Hi Zheng,
>
> It's p
Hi Zheng,
It's possible that there's a problem with your schema.xml. Are all fields
defined and have appropriate options enabled?
Regards,
Mostafa.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> I've tried that, and removed the data directory from both the shards.
Hi Erick,
I've tried that, and removed the data directory from both the shards. But
the same problem still occurs, so we probably can rule out the "memory"
issue.
Regards,
Edwin
On 30 March 2015 at 12:39, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I meant shut down Solr and physically remove the entire data
> di
I meant shut down Solr and physically remove the entire data
directory. Not saying this is the cure, but it can't hurt to rule out
the index having "memory"...
Best,
Erick
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> I used the following query to delete all the ind
Hi Erick,
I used the following query to delete all the index.
http://localhost:8983/solr/update?stream.body=*:*http://localhost:8983/solr/update?stream.body=
Or is it better to physically delete the entire data directory?
Regards,
Edwin
On 28 March 2015 at 02:27, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Y
Hi Andrea,
This is the query that I'm using.
http://localhost:8983/solr/logmill/select?q=*:*&wt=xml&indent=true
This is the stacktrace that I got.
500
10
true
*:*
xml
java.lang.NullPointerException at
org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.mergeId
You say you re-indexed, did you _completely_ remove the data directory
first, i.e. the parent of the "index" and, maybe, "tlog" directories?
I've occasionally seen remnants of old definitions "pollute" the new
one, and since the key is so fundamental I can see it
being a problem.
Best,
Erick
On
Hi Edwin,
please provide some other detail about your context, (e.g. complete
stacktrace, query you're issuing)
Best,
Andrea
On 03/27/2015 09:38 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've changed my uniqueKey to another name, instead of using id, on the
schema.xml.
However, after I ha
Hi everyone,
I've changed my uniqueKey to another name, instead of using id, on the
schema.xml.
However, after I have done the indexing (the indexing is successful), I'm
not able to perform a search query on it. I gives the error
java.lang.NullPointerException.
Is there other place which I need
17 matches
Mail list logo
