Gently walking into rough waters here, but if you use any API with GET, you're sending a URI which must be properly encoded. This has nothing to do with with the programming language that generates key and store pairs on the browser or the one(s) used on the server. Lots and lots of good folks have tripped over this one.http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_urlencode.asp Play hard, but play safe!
> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 13:58:55 +0800 > Subject: Re: Unable to perform search query after changing uniqueKey > From: edwinye...@gmail.com > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Thanks Erick. > > Yes, it is able to work correct if I do not use spaces for the field names, > especially for the uniqueKey. > > Regards, > Edwin > > > On 31 March 2015 at 13:58, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I would never put spaces in my field names! Frankly I have no clue > > what Solr does with that, but it can't be good. Solr explicitly > > supports Java naming conventions, camel case, underscores and numbers. > > Special symbols are frowned upon, I never use anything but upper case, > > lower case and underscores. Actually, I don't use upper case either > > but that's a personal preference. Other things might work, but only by > > chance. > > > > Best, > > Erick > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > > <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Latest information that I've found for this is that the error only occurs > > > for shard2. > > > > > > If I do a search for just shard1, those records that are assigned to > > shard1 > > > will be able to be displayed. Only when I search for shard2 will the > > > NullPointerException error occurs. Previously I was doing a search for > > both > > > shards. > > > > > > Is there any settings that I required to do for shard2 in order to solve > > > this issue? Currently I have not made any changes to the shards since I > > > created it using > > > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=nps1&numShards=2&collection.configName=collection1 > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Edwin > > > > > > On 31 March 2015 at 09:42, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Erick, > > >> > > >> I've changed the uniqueKey from id to Item No. > > >> > > >> <uniqueKey>Item No</uniqueKey> > > >> > > >> > > >> Below are my definitions for both the id and Item No. > > >> > > >> <field name="id" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" > > >> required="false" multiValued="false" /> > > >> <field name="Item No" type="text_general" indexed="true" stored="true"/> > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Edwin > > >> > > >> > > >> On 30 March 2015 at 23:05, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Well, let's see the definition of your ID field, 'cause I'm puzzled. > > >>> > > >>> It's definitely A Bad Thing to have it be any kind of tokenized field > > >>> though, but that's a shot in the dark. > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> Erick > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > > >>> <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > Hi Mostafa, > > >>> > > > >>> > Yes, I've defined all the fields in schema.xml. It is able to work on > > >>> the > > >>> > version without SolrCloud, but it is not working for the one with > > >>> SolrCloud. > > >>> > Both of them are using the same schema.xml. > > >>> > > > >>> > Regards, > > >>> > Edwin > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On 30 March 2015 at 14:34, Mostafa Gomaa <mostafa.goma...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> >> Hi Zheng, > > >>> >> > > >>> >> It's possible that there's a problem with your schema.xml. Are all > > >>> fields > > >>> >> defined and have appropriate options enabled? > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Regards, > > >>> >> > > >>> >> Mostafa. > > >>> >> > > >>> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo < > > >>> edwinye...@gmail.com > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> wrote: > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > Hi Erick, > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > I've tried that, and removed the data directory from both the > > >>> shards. But > > >>> >> > the same problem still occurs, so we probably can rule out the > > >>> "memory" > > >>> >> > issue. > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > Regards, > > >>> >> > Edwin > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > On 30 March 2015 at 12:39, Erick Erickson < > > erickerick...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> wrote: > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > I meant shut down Solr and physically remove the entire data > > >>> >> > > directory. Not saying this is the cure, but it can't hurt to > > rule > > >>> out > > >>> >> > > the index having "memory"... > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > Best, > > >>> >> > > Erick > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > > >>> >> > > <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> >> > > > Hi Erick, > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > I used the following query to delete all the index. > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/update?stream.body= > > >>> >> > > <delete><query>*:*</query></delete> > > >>> >> > > http://localhost:8983/solr/update?stream.body=<commit/> > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > Or is it better to physically delete the entire data > > directory? > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > Regards, > > >>> >> > > > Edwin > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > > On 28 March 2015 at 02:27, Erick Erickson < > > >>> erickerick...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> > > wrote: > > >>> >> > > > > > >>> >> > > >> You say you re-indexed, did you _completely_ remove the data > > >>> >> directory > > >>> >> > > >> first, i.e. the parent of the "index" and, maybe, "tlog" > > >>> >> directories? > > >>> >> > > >> I've occasionally seen remnants of old definitions "pollute" > > >>> the new > > >>> >> > > >> one, and since the <uniqueKey> key is so fundamental I can > > see > > >>> it > > >>> >> > > >> being a problem. > > >>> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > > >> Best, > > >>> >> > > >> Erick > > >>> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > > >> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Andrea Gazzarini < > > >>> >> > > a.gazzar...@gmail.com> > > >>> >> > > >> wrote: > > >>> >> > > >> > Hi Edwin, > > >>> >> > > >> > please provide some other detail about your context, (e.g. > > >>> >> complete > > >>> >> > > >> > stacktrace, query you're issuing) > > >>> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > > >> > Best, > > >>> >> > > >> > Andrea > > >>> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > > >> > On 03/27/2015 09:38 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote: > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> Hi everyone, > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> I've changed my uniqueKey to another name, instead of > > using > > >>> id, > > >>> >> on > > >>> >> > > the > > >>> >> > > >> >> schema.xml. > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> However, after I have done the indexing (the indexing is > > >>> >> > successful), > > >>> >> > > >> I'm > > >>> >> > > >> >> not able to perform a search query on it. I gives the > > error > > >>> >> > > >> >> java.lang.NullPointerException. > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> Is there other place which I need to configure, besides > > >>> changing > > >>> >> > the > > >>> >> > > >> >> uniqueKey field in scheam.xml? > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> Regards, > > >>> >> > > >> >> Edwin > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >> > > > >>> >> > > >> > > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > >
