Have been using SOLR for almost five years. Great, powerful software.
Thanks to all the developers for this masterpiece.
Appreciate it,
Serkan
Congrats Doug & John, will order a copy!
Thanks,
On Tuesday, June 21, 2016, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Not much more to add than my post here! This book is targeted towards
> Lucene-based search (Elasticsearch and Solr) relevance.
>
Thanks for all the pointers. With 50% discount, picking a copy is a
no-brainer
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ANN-Relevant-Search-by-Manning-out-Thanks-Solr-community-tp4283667p4284107.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks John, and Mary Joe
Yeah it's definitely more about "relevance" than ES or Solr. So the choice
in search engine is more an implementation detail. We chose ES because it's
more book/educational friendly, not necessarily because it's the best
choice as a search engin
I'll add my vote that reading the book will really expand your
understanding of search and "Relevance".
If you're working in the Search space, this book is really worth your time!
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:59 PM, MaryJo Sminkey wrote:
> > For someone familiar with Solr, will it be an issue to r
> For someone familiar with Solr, will it be an issue to run those examples
> in a Solr instance instead ?
>
You can't run ES code on Solr, and the syntax is quite different, so you do
have to figure out how to convert it yourself and it's not always very
obvious. There is an appendix that covers
instance instead ?
-Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ANN-Relevant-Search-by-Manning-out-Thanks-Solr-community-tp4283667p4284079.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all the kind words everyone! I look forward to seeing you at
> Revolution
>
> It probably wasn't clear, but the discount code is in the image on my
> announcement blog post.
> http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2016/06/21/relev
Thanks for all the kind words everyone! I look forward to seeing you at
Revolution
It probably wasn't clear, but the discount code is in the image on my
announcement blog post.
http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2016/06/21/relevant-search-published/
But I'll also just pas
>
> Announcement with discount code:
> http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2016/06/21/relevant-search-published/
>
> Related hacker news thread:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11946636
>
> Thanks to everyone in the Solr community that was helpful to my efforts.
>
read:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11946636
>
> Thanks to everyone in the Solr community that was helpful to my efforts.
> Specifically Trey Grainger, Eric Pugh (for keeping me employed), Charlie
> Hull and the Flax team, Alex Rafalovitch, Timothy Potter, Yonik Seeley,
>
s://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11946636
>
> Thanks to everyone in the Solr community that was helpful to my efforts.
> Specifically Trey Grainger, Eric Pugh (for keeping me employed), Charlie
> Hull and the Flax team, Alex Rafalovitch, Timothy Potter, Yonik Seeley,
> Grant Ingersoll
r) relevance.
>
> Announcement with discount code:
> http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2016/06/21/relevant-search-published/
>
> Related hacker news thread:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11946636
>
> Thanks to everyone in the Solr community that was helpful to my e
2:12 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: John Berryman
Subject: [ANN] Relevant Search by Manning out! (Thanks Solr community!)
Not much more to add than my post here! This book is targeted towards
Lucene-based search (Elasticsearch and Solr) relevance.
Announcement with discount code:
n 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Doug Turnbull <
dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> Thanks Will and John! You both have also been helpful.
>
>
> If you want a great relevance-heavy search conference, you better be at
> Lucene/Solr Revolution in October!!
> http://luc
Thanks Will and John! You both have also been helpful.
If you want a great relevance-heavy search conference, you better be at
Lucene/Solr Revolution in October!!
http://lucenerevolution.org/
"Lucene Revolution: Officially Endorsed by the Authors of Relevant Search"
See everyone on t
ost here! This book is targeted towards
> Lucene-based search (Elasticsearch and Solr) relevance.
>
> Announcement with discount code:
> http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2016/06/21/relevant-search-published/
>
> Related hacker news thread:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/it
t with discount code:
> http://opensourceconnections.com/blog/2016/06/21/relevant-search-published/
>
> Related hacker news thread:
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11946636
>
> Thanks to everyone in the Solr community that was helpful to my efforts.
> Specifically Trey Grainger, Eric Pugh
?id=11946636
Thanks to everyone in the Solr community that was helpful to my efforts.
Specifically Trey Grainger, Eric Pugh (for keeping me employed), Charlie
Hull and the Flax team, Alex Rafalovitch, Timothy Potter, Yonik Seeley,
Grant Ingersoll (for basically teaching me Solr back in the day
Subscribed! Just integrating solr 4.1 in a corporate GIS architecture as we
speak.
Thanks!
Guilherme Pires
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Fehling [mailto:bernd.fehl...@uni-bielefeld.de]
Sent: terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013 15:34
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: thanks for
Now this must be said, thanks for solr 4.1 (and lucene 4.1)!
Great improvements compared to 4.0.
After building the first 4.1 index I thought the index was broken, but had no
error messages anywhere.
Why I thought it was damaged?
The index size went down from 167 GB (solr 4.0) to 115 GB (solr
The query in question should be:
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-do-I-use-localparams-joins-using-SolrJ-and-or-the-Admin-GUI-tp3872088p3877927.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you build it, they will come!
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:59 PM, vybe3142 wrote:
> I'm still puzzled that there are no readily available alternatives to using
> the Tika based ExtractingRequestHandler in the situation where the input
> data is plain UTF-8 text files that SOLR needs to injest a
: To get this to work correctly, the following server side config was needed
: (I started from a barebones solr config)
: 1. Add apache-solr-cell-3.5.0.jar to the /lib directory (or
: wherever solr can access jars) as this contains the class
: ExtractingRequestHandler
: 2. Add the appropriate han
puzzled that there are no readily available alternatives to using
the Tika based ExtractingRequestHandler in the situation where the input
data is plain UTF-8 text files that SOLR needs to injest and index. I may
need to look into defining a custom Request Handler if that's the right way
to go.
Thanks a
Got my API to input into both the database and the Solr instance, search
geograhically/chronologically in Solr.
Next is Update and Delete. And then .. and then ... and then ..
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usua
+1
And thanks to you both for all your work on CommonGrams!
Tom Burton-West
Jason Rutherglen-2 wrote:
>
> Robert, thanks for redoing all the Solr analyzers to the new API! It
> helps to have many examples to work from, best practices so to speak.
>
>
--
View this mes
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
> Robert, thanks for redoing all the Solr analyzers to the new API! It
> helps to have many examples to work from, best practices so to speak.
>
+1
Thank you so much Robert!
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
thanks, well All would be a little inaccurate... we still have one huge
monster (Synonyms) remaining and some other smaller stuff: SOLR-1657 has a
list with the finished stuff crossed-out.
think WDF took a year off my life, but will take a second look now and see
if i can resolve some more of
Robert, thanks for redoing all the Solr analyzers to the new API! It
helps to have many examples to work from, best practices so to speak.
http://www.zoocasa.com)
-Original Message-
From: gwk [mailto:g...@eyefi.nl]
Sent: August-27-09 8:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Thanks
Hello,
Earlier this your our company decided to (finally :)) upgrade our
website to something a little faster/prettier/maintainable-er. After
This looks great! Congratulations!
Feel free to add your site to the "Powered by Solr" page at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:34 PM, gwk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Earlier this your our company decided to (finally :)) upgrade our website
> to something a little fas
structure for the search engines. I'm not sure if this is
your intention or not, but you could massively increase the number of pages the
crawlers see by extending your url rewrites to be a bit more static
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the reply, actually, we did think about SEO, turn off
jav
which in turn has increased general traffic and organic traffic (eg
www.visordown.com, www.madeformums.com)
Cheers
Dave
-Original Message-
From: gwk [mailto:g...@eyefi.nl]
Sent: 27 August 2009 13:04
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Thanks
Hello,
Earlier this your our
Hello,
Earlier this your our company decided to (finally :)) upgrade our
website to something a little faster/prettier/maintainable-er. After
some research we decided on using Solr and after indexing our data for
the first time and trying some manual queries we were all amazed at the
speed. T
Hi Yonik Seeley, Erik Hatcher and others.
Thanks for all the help fixing the bugs I ran into using the new 1.3
distributed features with rails (shards).
I now have medline fully indexed in 7 solr shards (with 2 spare). Each
server has 8GB RAM and a Quad Core 2.4GHz. As a test, I ran about 2
bout the file in data/solr/ this directory which contain
> solr.war.
> Yes I did try !!
>
>
> ryantxu wrote:
>>
>> hymm -- i've replied to this three times now... but it does not appear
>> the list revieved it...
>> http://www.nabble.com/Any-idea---
he list revieved it...
> http://www.nabble.com/Any-idea-I%27m-lost--Thanks-to19762598.html
> (now i'm trying from a different client)
>
> Have you tried "solr.xml" rather then "multicore.xml"?
>
> before 1.3 was released, the file was renamed
>
hymm -- i've replied to this three times now... but it does not appear
the list revieved it...
http://www.nabble.com/Any-idea-I%27m-lost--Thanks-to19762598.html
(now i'm trying from a different client)
Have you tried "solr.xml" rather then "multicore.xml"?
ne. If I were you I'd try using 1.3. To be
> honest, if I remember correctly, 1.2 didn't have multicore support.
>
> Regards
> Brendan
>
>
> On Oct 1, 2008, at 12:20 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks Brendan,
>>
>> I use solr 1.2 ... I
Sorry Sunny,
Will have to punt on this one. If I were you I'd try using 1.3. To be
honest, if I remember correctly, 1.2 didn't have multicore support.
Regards
Brendan
On Oct 1, 2008, at 12:20 PM, sunnyfr wrote:
Thanks Brendan,
I use solr 1.2 ... I will update to solr 1.3
'solr/'
>>>>> Oct 1 16:45:10 solr-test jsvc.exec[23757]: Oct 1, 2008 4:45:10 PM
>>>>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader createClassLoader INFO:
>>>>> Reusing
>>>>> parent classloader
>>>>> Oct 1 16:45
lina
.core
.ApplicationFilterConfig.getFilter(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:
221)
^Iat
org
.apache
.catalina
.core
.ApplicationFilterConfig.setFilterDef(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:
302)
^Iat
org
.apache
.catalina
.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:
78)
^Iat org.apache.catalina.core
--
View this m
Thanks Brendan,
I use solr 1.2 ... I will update to solr 1.3 soon .. I tried to rename it
... but still .
help i need somebody .. heppp LOL
Thanks Brendan
Brendan Grainger-2 wrote:
>
> Hi Sunny,
>
> Sorry, I've not use multicores with tomcat yet. However, I see
8)
>>> ^Iat
>>> org
>>> .apache
>>> .solr.core.SolrResourceLoader.openConfig(SolrResourceLoader.java:136)
>>> ^Iat org.apache.solr.core.Config.(Config.java:97) ^Iat
>>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.(SolrConfig.java:108) ^Iat
>>> org.apa
licationFilterConfig.setFilterDef(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:
302)
^Iat
org
.apache
.catalina
.core.ApplicationFilterConfig.(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:
78)
^Iat org.apache.catalina.core
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Any-idea-I%27m-lost--Thanks-tp19762598
gt;> ^Iat org.apache.solr.core.Config.(Config.java:97) ^Iat
>>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.(SolrConfig.java:108) ^Iat
>>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig.(SolrConfig.java:65) ^Iat
>>> org
>>> .apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.init(SolrDispatchFilter.ja
> 89)
>> ^Iat
>> org
>> .apache
>> .catalina
>> .core.ApplicationFilterConfig.getFilter(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:
>> 221)
>> ^Iat
>> org
>> .apache
>> .catalina
>> .core
>> .ApplicationFilterConfig.setFilt
ionFilterConfig.(ApplicationFilterConfig.java:78)
^Iat org.apache.catalina.core
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Any-idea-I%27m-lost--Thanks-tp19762598p19762598.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
tionFilterConfig.java:78)
^Iat org.apache.catalina.core
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Any-idea-I%27m-lost--Thanks-tp19762598p19762598.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
51 matches
Mail list logo
