Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2013-12-12 Thread Furkan KAMACI
2013 06:38:09 -0800 > From: ml-node+s472066n4106382...@n3.nabble.com > To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788 > > > > Hi; > > > Yes, I am talking about SOLR-788. There writes 4.1 so it means that it has > > fixed at 4.1. O

RE: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2013-12-12 Thread gf80
om To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788 Hi; Yes, I am talking about SOLR-788. There writes 4.1 so it means that it has fixed at 4.1. On the other hand some patches are applied both for ongoing versions and trunk. 5.0 is the trunk version of

Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2013-12-12 Thread Furkan KAMACI
03:51:04 -0800 > From: ml-node+s472066n4106355...@n3.nabble.com > To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788 > > > > Hi; > > > SOLR-4414 has no patch. It's related issue has patches bu it seems fixed > > since Solr 4.

RE: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2013-12-12 Thread gf80
nks in advance, -giuseppe Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 03:51:04 -0800 From: ml-node+s472066n4106355...@n3.nabble.com To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788 Hi; SOLR-4414 has no patch. It's related issue has patches bu it seems fixed since Sol

Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2013-12-12 Thread Furkan KAMACI
x > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-and-MoreLikeThis-SOLR-788-tp4022581p4106258.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2013-12-11 Thread gf80
6. Thanks a lot in advance, Giuseppe P.S. Rakudten: Did you figure out the problem applying patch? Tx -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-and-MoreLikeThis-SOLR-788-tp4022581p4106258.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2012-11-27 Thread Mark Miller
I wouldn't use a random code - follow the pattern of increments. - Mark On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote: > Hello, Mark. > > I didn´t know if adding that constant (with a random hexadecimal selected > by me) could affect to other parts of code. In fact some day it existed

Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2012-11-27 Thread Luis Cappa Banda
Hello, Mark. I didn´t know if adding that constant (with a random hexadecimal selected by me) could affect to other parts of code. In fact some day it existed and currently not, so it may be a reason why that occurred. Also, copy & pasting a patch that you don´t really understand what´s doing and

Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2012-11-27 Thread Mark Miller
Add it? - Mark On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Luis Cappa Banda wrote: > I´ve recently patched Solr 4.0 tag but it exists a conflict > with PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS final static attributed in ShardRequest.java. > The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips? > > Regards, > > > - Luis Cappa.

Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2012-11-27 Thread Luis Cappa Banda
I´ve recently patched Solr 4.0 tag but it exists a conflict with PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS final static attributed in ShardRequest.java. The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips? Regards, - Luis Cappa. 2012/11/27 Luis Cappa Banda > Hello, guys. > > Does anyone tested the latest > SOL

SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788

2012-11-27 Thread Luis Cappa Banda
Hello, guys. Does anyone tested the latest SOLR-788 MLT patch with Solr 4.0? It´s a very important Sorl feature that I would like to have in a SolrCloud environment. I use Eclipse as IDE, and I´m familiarized with Maven so it looks like I´ll spend o