Hello, Mark. I didn´t know if adding that constant (with a random hexadecimal selected by me) could affect to other parts of code. In fact some day it existed and currently not, so it may be a reason why that occurred. Also, copy & pasting a patch that you don´t really understand what´s doing and setting a new constant to Solr code sounds a little bit, errr... unsafe, :-P
I´ll try tomorrow. Regards, - Luis Cappa. 2012/11/27 Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> > Add it? > > - Mark > > On Nov 27, 2012, at 6:33 AM, Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I´ve recently patched Solr 4.0 tag but it exists a conflict > > with PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS final static attributed in > ShardRequest.java. > > The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips? > > > > Regards, > > > > > > - Luis Cappa. > > > > > > 2012/11/27 Luis Cappa Banda <luisca...@gmail.com> > > > >> Hello, guys. > >> > >> Does anyone tested the latest SOLR-788< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788> MLT > >> patch with Solr 4.0? It´s a very important Sorl feature that I would > like > >> to have in a SolrCloud environment. I use Eclipse as IDE, and I´m > >> familiarized with Maven so it looks like I´ll spend one or two days > >> configuring a dev environment to apply the patch and compile de code > with > >> Ant, Ivy, etc.. Before doing that 'effort' I would like to know if > everyone > >> applied this patch before and if the result was good. > >> > >> Thank you very much! > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> -- > >> > >> - Luis Cappa > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > - Luis Cappa > > -- - Luis Cappa
