Re: Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread John Blythe
That's why i provide my email :) already spoke w several people at fusion and was hoping to pick your brain in particular. Thanks anyway tho, the info was helpful! best, -- John Blythe On Feb 5, 2016, 8:44 AM -0500, Erik Hatcher, wrote: > John - best to not have non-Solr discussions on the lis

Re: Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread Erik Hatcher
John - best to not have non-Solr discussions on the list, but feel free to reach out to us at Lucidworks to connect further about it. — Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect http://www.lucidworks.com > On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:34 AM, John Blythe wrote: > > hey er

Re: Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread John Blythe
hey erick, thanks for this. if it's not against the newsletters policy, and is alright w you in general, i'd love to have a side discussion about LW/Fusion. j...@curvolabs.com best, -- *John Blythe* Product Manager & Lead Developer 251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com www.curvolabs.com 58 Adams

Re: Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread Erik Hatcher
There’s several moving pieces to Fusion’s signals processing, so we’d certainly encourage you to try Fusion out yourself and not reinvent these wheels :) But here’s the general gist of how it works: - events/signals/clicks are logged (to a separate Solr collection) - periodically jobs run t

Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread John Blythe
hi all, i'm trying to find more information online about how to implement something similar to the 'signals' feature found in Fusion. so far i've found one decent article that isn't discussing the Fusion feature specifically. does any of you happen to have some solid resources to point me in the d