John - best to not have non-Solr discussions on the list, but feel free to 
reach out to us at Lucidworks to connect further about it. 

—
Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
http://www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>



> On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:34 AM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote:
> 
> hey erick,
> 
> thanks for this. if it's not against the newsletters policy, and is alright
> w you in general, i'd love to have a side discussion about LW/Fusion.
> j...@curvolabs.com
> 
> best,
> 
> -- 
> *John Blythe*
> Product Manager & Lead Developer
> 
> 251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com
> www.curvolabs.com
> 
> 58 Adams Ave
> Evansville, IN 47713
> 
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> There’s several moving pieces to Fusion’s signals processing, so we’d
>> certainly encourage you to try Fusion out yourself and not reinvent these
>> wheels  :)
>> 
>> But here’s the general gist of how it works:
>> 
>>  - events/signals/clicks are logged (to a separate Solr collection)
>>  - periodically jobs run that aggregate signals into boostable weights,
>> and clean up used/unneeded/old signals
>>    aggregated signals are stored in a separate Solr collection also
>>  - query pipeline includes stages that look up signals matching the query,
>>    prune/distill the retrieved signals,
>>    and then incorporate them into the actual search request
>> 
>> Signals, in Fusion, are general purpose and could enable not only click
>> boosting but also search history boosting, item/item, query/item, and
>> item/query facilities.
>> 
>> —
>> Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect
>> http://www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Feb 5, 2016, at 5:48 AM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> hi all,
>>> 
>>> i'm trying to find more information online about how to implement
>> something
>>> similar to the 'signals' feature found in Fusion. so far i've found one
>>> decent article that isn't discussing the Fusion feature specifically.
>> does
>>> any of you happen to have some solid resources to point me in the
>> direction
>>> of concerning this?
>>> 
>>> thanks-
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to