Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Gnanam
472066.n3.nabble.com/Server-vs-Client-JDK-compatibility-tp4109982p4110146.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
hich one > among the list is highly recommended and easy to integrate & use from > within > Java platform? Working example for the same are highly appreciated. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Server-vs-Client-JDK-compatibil

Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 1/7/2014 10:19 PM, Gnanam wrote: > Shawn Heisey-4 wrote >> Although SolrJ is a standalone component, it is also an integral part of >> Solr itself, so it has the same Java requirement as Solr. It is highly >> unlikely that it will work at all with a 1.3.x Java version. > > Thanks Shawn. So wh

Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Gnanam
message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Server-vs-Client-JDK-compatibility-tp4109982p4110136.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Walter Underwood
Doesn't 1.3 have Y2K problems? I thought we got rid of that ancient stuff a decade ago. Nothing supports 1.3. You get to use old, unsupported versions of everything. With tons of security holes. wunder On Jan 7, 2014, at 9:19 PM, Gnanam wrote: > Shawn Heisey-4 wrote >> Although SolrJ is a st

Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Gnanam
1.3? Or any pointers/way to figure out this from the archive/previous release folder? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Server-vs-Client-JDK-compatibility-tp4109982p4110132.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Alexandre Rafalovitch
be supported, indexed > and > searchable? > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Server-vs-Client-JDK-compatibility-tp4109982.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > Currently our application is running on BroadVision server which is actually : > based on very older version of JDK that is v1.3. Now we've a requirement ... : > and the client library (SolrJ) running behind a lower version (JDK 1.3), : > since the client API will be invoked/used from

Re: Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 1/7/2014 7:30 AM, Gnanam wrote: > Currently our application is running on BroadVision server which is actually > based on very older version of JDK that is v1.3. Now we've a requirement > for searching documents and we want to integrate Apache Solr within our > application. We have also decide

Server vs Client - JDK compatibility

2014-01-07 Thread Gnanam
this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Server-vs-Client-JDK-compatibility-tp4109982.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.