Thanks Alex for the response. Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote > What features are you planning to use from SolrJ client? Because you can > always just talk to Solr server directly with HTTP query URLs and JSON > results.
Because SolrJ is a Java client, we've chosen that as the default client that without much thought. We just need to query/run search in the Solr server and get the result response in the form of Java Bean, as all the parsing is done by SolrJ. Nothing else. Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote > Do you need to support multiple Solr servers? No, we don't need multi Solr server support. Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote > Do you want bean mapping? Something else? Of course, yes we need bean mapping which will be more convenient and easy to use. We don't want to roll out our own response parsing. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Server-vs-Client-JDK-compatibility-tp4109982p4110146.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
