Re: Potential Slow searching for unified highlighting on Solr 8.8.0/8.8.1

attachments from all devices. -Original Message- From: Ere Maijala Sent: 01 March 2021 12:53 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Potential Slow searching for unified highlighting on Solr 8.8.0/8.8.1 EXTERNAL EMAIL - Be cautious of all links and attachments. Hi, Whoa, thanks f

RE: Potential Slow searching for unified highlighting on Solr 8.8.0/8.8.1

the e-mail and its attachments from all devices. -Original Message- From: Ere Maijala Sent: 01 March 2021 12:53 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Potential Slow searching for unified highlighting on Solr 8.8.0/8.8.1 EXTERNAL EMAIL - Be cautious of all links and attach

Re: Potential Slow searching for unified highlighting on Solr 8.8.0/8.8.1

Hi, Whoa, thanks for the heads-up! You may just have saved me from a whole lot of trouble. Did you file a JIRA ticket already? Thanks, Ere Flowerday, Matthew J kirjoitti 1.3.2021 klo 14.00: Hi There I just came across a situation where a unified highlighting search under solr 8.8.0/8.8.1 c

Potential Slow searching for unified highlighting on Solr 8.8.0/8.8.1

Hi There I just came across a situation where a unified highlighting search under solr 8.8.0/8.8.1 can take over 20 mins to run and eventually times out. I resolved it by a config change - but it can catch you out. Hence this email. With solr 8.8.0 a new unified highlighting parameter &hl.f

Re: Searching for credit card numbers

on (that would be without any downtime for > the users but you require of course corresponding space). > >> Am 28.07.2020 um 21:06 schrieb lstusr 5u93n4 : >> >> Possible... yes. Agreed that this is the right approach. But if we already >> have a big index that we&#x

Re: Searching for credit card numbers

course corresponding space). > Am 28.07.2020 um 21:06 schrieb lstusr 5u93n4 : > > Possible... yes. Agreed that this is the right approach. But if we already > have a big index that we're searching through? Any way to "hack it"? > >> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020

Re: Searching for credit card numbers

Possible... yes. Agreed that this is the right approach. But if we already have a big index that we're searching through? Any way to "hack it"? On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 14:55, Walter Underwood wrote: > I’d do that at index time. Add an update request processor script that &g

Re: Searching for credit card numbers

7;s say I have a text field that's been indexed with the standard > tokenizer, and I want to match the docs that have credit card numbers in > them (this is for altruistic purposes, not nefarious ones!). What's the > best way to build a search that will do this? > > Searc

Searching for credit card numbers

Let's say I have a text field that's been indexed with the standard tokenizer, and I want to match the docs that have credit card numbers in them (this is for altruistic purposes, not nefarious ones!). What's the best way to build a search that will do this?

Re: Searching document content and mult-valued fields

Hi Shaun, If project content is relatively static, you could use nested documents or you could plain with join query parser . HTH, Emir -- Mon

Searching document content and mult-valued fields

Hi Been using Solr on a project now for a couple of years and is working well. It's just a simple index of about 20 - 25 fields and 7,000 project records. Now there's a requirement to be able to search on the content of documents (web pages, Word, pdf etc) related to those projects. My initial t

Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

ity.json to Zookeeper. I can > > log in the Solr Admin UI. I can create collections and aliases, and I can > > index documents in Solr. > > > > Collections : test1, test2 > > Alias: test (combines test1, test2) > > > > Indexed document "solr-word

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

g anyways.) Isabelle Giguère Computational Linguist & Java Developer Linguiste informaticienne & développeur java De : Aroop Ganguly Envoyé : 14 juin 2020 17:37 À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in sec

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

Developer > Linguiste informaticienne & développeur java > > > > De : Jan Høydahl mailto:jan@cominvent.com>> > Envoyé : 13 juin 2020 17:50 > À : solr-user <mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>> > Objet : Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HT

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

Developer Linguiste informaticienne & développeur java De : Jan Høydahl Envoyé : 13 juin 2020 17:50 À : solr-user Objet : Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr I did not manage to reproduce. Feel free to open the JIRA and attach the

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

/xml; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Length: 1332 > > > > > > true > 401 > 16 > >*:* > > > > Error contains the full html HTTP 401 message (with escaped characters, of > course) > Gist of it : HTTP ERROR 401 require authentication >

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

application/xml; charset=UTF-8 Content-Length: 1332 true 401 16 *:* Error contains the full html HTTP 401 message (with escaped characters, of course) Gist of it : HTTP ERROR 401 require authentication Thanks; Isabelle Giguère Computational Linguist & Java Develope

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

gt; useless. > > ** > > > Isabelle Giguère > Computational Linguist & Java Developer > Linguiste informaticienne & développeur java > > > > De : Jan Høydahl > Envoyé : 12 juin 2020 06:55 > À : solr-u

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

De : Jan Høydahl Envoyé : 12 juin 2020 06:55 À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr Hi I tried to reproduce, but I can successfully search both the collection and the alias. Both collection and alias promt for password, a

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

mp; Java Developer > Linguiste informaticienne & développeur java > > > > De : Isabelle Giguere > Envoyé : 10 juin 2020 16:11 > À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Objet : Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr >

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

eloppeur java De : Isabelle Giguere Envoyé : 10 juin 2020 16:11 À : solr-user@lucene.apache.org Objet : Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr Hi Jan; Thank you for your reply. This is security.json as seen in Zookeeper. Credent

Re: [EXTERNAL] - Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

tionPlugin", "permissions":[{ "name":"all", "role":"admin"}], "user-role":{"admin":"admin"}, "":{"v":8}}} Thanks for feedback Isabelle Giguère Computational Linguist

Re: HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

index > documents in Solr. > > Collections : test1, test2 > Alias: test (combines test1, test2) > > Indexed document "solr-word.pdf" in collection test1 > > Searching on a collection works: > http://localhost:8983/solr/test1/select?q=*:*&wt=xml > >

HTTP 401 when searching on alias in secured Solr

ollection test1 Searching on a collection works: http://localhost:8983/solr/test1/select?q=*:*&wt=xml But searching on an alias results in HTTP 401 http://localhost:8983/solr/test/select?q=*:*&wt=xml Error from server at null: Expected mime type application/octet-stream but got

Re: Searching individual pages in solr

Hi! > > I'm looking for some guidance on engineering a solution for searching > individual pages of PDF documents. I currently have a SolrCloud setup that > uses an external tika server to extract text data from PDFs. I'd like to be > able to search individual pages f

Searching individual pages in solr

Hi! I'm looking for some guidance on engineering a solution for searching individual pages of PDF documents. I currently have a SolrCloud setup that uses an external tika server to extract text data from PDFs. I'd like to be able to search individual pages for search results a

Re: Need help in GeoSpatial Searching into Solr Server

Why are you using text field for location? You must use the proper field type. You need to follow the instructions in the “spatial search” section of the reference guide, here’s the ref guide for Solr 7: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_7/spatial-search.html Best, Erick > On Dec 23, 201

Need help in GeoSpatial Searching into Solr Server

I have 100 documents into Solr, type of location field is *org.apache.solr.schema.TextField.* I am unable to run any query to search nearby points with reference to that field. So if you can help into it or provide some program reference in JAVA with same kind of implementation. Thanks, Niraj

Re: Sometimes searching slow in Solr 6.1.0

ea to read it fully, and come back with any questions you have about it. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems#Asking_for_help_on_a_memory.2Fperformance_issue I have faced a slow searching issue in our live environment. In our scenario, there are many updat

Sometimes searching slow in Solr 6.1.0

We have 2 shards and 2 replicas in our live environment. Total of 26 collections. we give 64GB RAM for a single Solr instance. I have faced a slow searching issue in our live environment. In our scenario, there are many update requests come within minutes like 50,000. At that time searching

Aw: Searching a nested structure. Can not retrieve parents with all corresponding childs

n: "Marco Ibscher" An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Searching a nested structure. Can not retrieve parents with all corresponding childs Hi there, I have problems retrieving data in the nested structure in that it is indexed in solr 8.2: I have a product database with product

Searching a nested structure. Can not retrieve parents with all corresponding childs

ps://stackoverflow.com/questions/59162038/searching-a-nested-structure-can-not-retirve-parents-with-all-corresponding-chi Thank you. Marco

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

Client jar conflicts, but I am unable to resolve it. I request you to help me as what could be the issue and how it could be resolved. Thanks! -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 August 2019 16:57 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subje

Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

ickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Sent: 28 August 2019 16:50 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata > > Attachments are aggressively stripped of attachments, you’ll have to either > post it someplace

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

p; giving Null Pointer Exception. -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 August 2019 16:50 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata Attachments are aggressively stripped of attachments,

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

sing, System.out.println(metadata.get("dc_creator")); --> I get 'null' -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 August 2019 16:50 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Require searching only for file content and not me

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

[mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 August 2019 16:50 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata Attachments are aggressively stripped of attachments, you’ll have to either post it someplace and provide a link or paste the re

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

y [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: 28 August 2019 14:18 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata On 8/27/2019 7:18 AM, Khare, Kushal (MIND) wrote: > Basically, what problem I am facing is - I am getting the textual content + &g

Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

-all field in the default schemas with this definition: mailto:kushal.kh...@mind-infotech.com] > Sent: 28 August 2019 16:30 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata > > I already tried this example, I am currently work

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

Attaching managed-schema.xml -Original Message- From: Khare, Kushal (MIND) [mailto:kushal.kh...@mind-infotech.com] Sent: 28 August 2019 16:30 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata I already tried this example, I am currently

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

ching the scrollconfig.xml & Managed-schema.xml for my collection. Please see to it & suggest where I am getting wrong. I can't even get to see the _text_ field in the query result, instead of stored parameter being true. Any help would really be appreciated. Thanks ! -Original Message

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

From: Jörn Franke [mailto:jornfra...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 August 2019 12:55 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata You need to provide a little bit more details. What is your Schema? How is the document structured ? Where do you get met

Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

On 8/27/2019 7:18 AM, Khare, Kushal (MIND) wrote: Basically, what problem I am facing is - I am getting the textual content + other metadata in my _text_ field. But, I want only the textual content written inside the document. I tried various Request Handler Update Extract configurations, but n

Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

apache.org > Subject: Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata > > It will be easier to parse documents create content, metadata and other > required fields yourself in place of using default post tool. You will have > better control on what is going to which fi

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

: Require searching only for file content and not metadata It will be easier to parse documents create content, metadata and other required fields yourself in place of using default post tool. You will have better control on what is going to which field. On Tue 27 Aug, 2019, 6:48 PM Khare

Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

; Please help me resolve this as I am badly stuck in this. > > -Original Message- > From: Khare, Kushal (MIND) [mailto:kushal.kh...@mind-infotech.com] > Sent: 27 August 2019 12:59 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; ch...@christopherschultz.net > Subject: RE: Require search

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

this as I am badly stuck in this. -Original Message- From: Khare, Kushal (MIND) [mailto:kushal.kh...@mind-infotech.com] Sent: 27 August 2019 12:59 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; ch...@christopherschultz.net Subject: RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata Chris, What

RE: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Kushal, On 8/26/19 07:52, Khare, Kushal (MIND) wrote: > This is Kushal Khare, a new addition to the user-list. I started > working with S

Re: Require searching only for file content and not metadata

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Kushal, On 8/26/19 07:52, Khare, Kushal (MIND) wrote: > This is Kushal Khare, a new addition to the user-list. I started > working with Solr few days ago for implementing it in my project. > > Now, I have the basics done, and reached the query sta

Require searching only for file content and not metadata

Hello Guys! This is Kushal Khare, a new addition to the user-list. I started working with Solr few days ago for implementing it in my project. Now, I have the basics done, and reached the query stage. My problem is – I need to restrict the solr to search only for the file content and not the meta

Re: Searching on dates and time

There should be a number of these in the example schemas, although perhaps without indexed=“true” in the fieldType... DateRanges are pretty cool, but this in the “keep it simple” category, you might just be able to use plain pdates with the standard [time TO time] syntax. Although when I try

Re: Searching on dates and time

Achieving the use-case is a must. So if here is an alternative to using solr.DateRangeField, I'm willing to use it. What do you mean by "pdate" and what is it? I'm reading this link on how to use DateRangeField but yet it is not working for me: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/working-wi

Re: Searching on dates and time

I think what Mikhail is asking is whether your use-case would be satisfied by just indexing a standard pdate rather than a daterange, then querying by fq=CC_FILE_DATETIME:[some_date/MONTH TO some_maybe_other_full_date]. With regular pdates, you can use “date math” to round to whatever you want o

Re: Searching on dates and time

I need both: point in time and range. In both cases, I need to be able to search between just 2 years, between year-month to year-month-day-time, etc. So getting my schema right, what and how I index right and the search syntax right are all important. This is why, in my original post, I shared

Re: Searching on dates and time

Hold on. Do you need a range or just point in time? On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 6:51 PM Steven White wrote: > Thanks Mikhail. I will read those links and switch over to latest Solr. > > Just to be sure, my schema setup and the way I'm indexing the date data are > not the issue, right? > > Steven. >

Re: Searching on dates and time

Thanks Mikhail. I will read those links and switch over to latest Solr. Just to be sure, my schema setup and the way I'm indexing the date data are not the issue, right? Steven. On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 11:05 AM Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Hello, > > The indexed daterange value is really narrow,

Re: Searching on dates and time

Hello, The indexed daterange value is really narrow, it might not be easy to pick per se. I'm in doubts regarding " in queries. At least TO syntax expects [ ] You can start from these baseline cases https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/master/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/schema/DateRan

Searching on dates and time

Hi everyone, I'm using Solr 7.2.1 but can upgrade if I must. I setup my schema like so: And indexed my data like so: doc.addField("CC_FILE_DATETIME", "2019-02-05T12:04:00Z");; When I try to search against this field, some search are working, others are not. Here are examples

Re: searching only within a date range

wrote: > Yeah, it can be opaque… > > My first guess is that you may not have a field “posttime” defined in your > schema and/or documents. For searching it needs “indexed=true” and for > faceting/grouping/sorting it should have “docValues=true”. That’s what your > original facet que

Re: searching only within a date range

2019 at 10:40 AM Erick Erickson wrote: > Yeah, it can be opaque… > > My first guess is that you may not have a field “posttime” defined in your > schema and/or documents. For searching it needs “indexed=true” and for > faceting/grouping/sorting it should have “docValues=true”. That’

Re: searching only within a date range

Yeah, it can be opaque… My first guess is that you may not have a field “posttime” defined in your schema and/or documents. For searching it needs “indexed=true” and for faceting/grouping/sorting it should have “docValues=true”. That’s what your original facet query was telling you, the field

Re: searching only within a date range

So, instead of addDateRangeFacet(), I used: query.setParam("fq", "posttime:[2010-01-01T00:00:00Z TO 2015-01-01T00:00:00Z]"); I didn't get any errors, but the query returned immediately with 0 results. Without this contraint, it searches 13,000 records and takes 1 to 2 minutes and returns 356 reco

Re: searching only within a date range

Hi Mark, you are using a "range facet" which is a "query-shape" feature, it doesn't have any constraint on the results (i.e. it doesn't filter at all). You need to add a filter query [1] with a date range clause (e.g. fq=field:[ TO or *>]). Best, Andrea [1] https://lucene.apache.org/solr/gui

searching only within a date range

Hello! I have a search setup and it works fine. I search a text field called "logtext" in a database table. My Java code is like this: SolrQuery query - new SolrQuery(); query.setQuery(searchWord); query.setParam("df", "logtext"); Then I execute the search... and it works just great. But now

RE: Issue Searching Data from multiple Databases

antoshkumar.saripa...@infinite.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 5:03 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Issue Searching Data from multiple Databases > > I am trying to achieve search by connecting to multiple Databases (in my case > trying with 2 different

Issue Searching Data from multiple Databases

I am trying to achieve search by connecting to multiple Databases (in my case trying with 2 different DBs) to index data from multiple DB tables. I have tried doing the below as an approach to achieve my goal but in vain, I am able to get only data from the DB 1 when I perform a full-import. Steps

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

gt; same configuration as production. > > > > Now we are facing some slowness in the searcher when we index document, > > when > > we stop indexing then searches is fine, while adding document then it > > become > > slow. one of solr server we are indexing other 2 fo

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

softlayer to digital ocean server with > same configuration as production. > > Now we are facing some slowness in the searcher when we index document, > when > we stop indexing then searches is fine, while adding document then it > become > slow. one of solr server we are i

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

gt;>>>> which will be searched over and hence take longer. Merging happens >>>>>>>> constantly but continuous indexing will still introduce smaller >>>> segments >>>>>>>> all the time. Have your tried running "optimize&qu

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

odically. Is it > >>>>>> something that you can afford to run? If you have a Master-Slave setup > >>>>> for > >>>>>> Indexer v/s searchers, you can replicate on optimize in the Master, > >>>>> thereby > >>>&

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

>>>> removing the optimize load on the searchers, but replicate to the >>>>> searcher >>>>>> periodically. That might help with reducing latency. Optimize merges >>>>>> segments and hence creates a more compact index that is faster to >&g

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

ically. That might help with reducing latency. Optimize merges > >>>> segments and hence creates a more compact index that is faster to > search. > >>>> It may involve some higher latency temporarily right after the > >>> replication, > >>>

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

t; but will go away soon after in-memory caches are full. >>>> >>>> What is the search count/sec you are seeing? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Parag >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:02 AM Mugeesh Husain >>> wrot

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

; Regards > > > Parag > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 2:02 AM Mugeesh Husain > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> We are running 3 node solr cloud(4.4) in our production infrastructure, > > We > > >

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

ean server > with > >> same configuration as production. > >> > >> Now we are facing some slowness in the searcher when we index document, > >> when > >> we stop indexing then searches is fine, while adding document then it > >> become > &

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

cloud(4.4) in our production infrastructure, We >> recently moved our SOLR server host softlayer to digital ocean server with >> same configuration as production. >> >> Now we are facing some slowness in the searcher when we index document, >> when >> we stop index

Re: searching is slow while adding document each time

nfiguration as production. > > Now we are facing some slowness in the searcher when we index document, > when > we stop indexing then searches is fine, while adding document then it > become > slow. one of solr server we are indexing other 2 for searching the request. > > > I a

searching is slow while adding document each time

is fine, while adding document then it become slow. one of solr server we are indexing other 2 for searching the request. I am just wondering what was the reason searches become slow while indexing even we are using same configuration as we had in prod? at the time we are pushing 500 document at

RE: Re: Multi word searching is not working getting random search results

, Jagadish M. -Original Message- From: Susheel Kumar [mailto:susheel2...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2018 3:01 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Multi word searching is not working getting random search results How about you search with Intermodal

Re: Multi word searching is not working getting random search results

How about you search with Intermodal Schedules (plural) & try phrase slop for better control on relevancy order https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:10 PM Muddapati, Jagadish < jagadish.muddap...@nscorp.com> wrote: > Label: new

Multi word searching is not working getting random search results

Label: newbie Environment: I am currently running solr on Linux platform. NAME="Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server" VERSION="7.5" openjdk version "1.8.0_181" AEM version: 6.2 I recently integrate solr to AEM and when i do search for multiple words the search results are getting randomly. search

RE: Searching by dates

Sitesearch platform, and index it to Solr so we can boost recent articles. But some of our customers use it together with a Lucene CharFilter to transform it on-the-fly (maintaining offsets and positions for highlighting) when indexing or searching, or embedded in a QueryParser. It is a mature

Re: Searching by dates

On 8/16/2018 9:20 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Hmm. I could have sworn the documentation I read in the past (maybe as > long as 3-4 months ago) indicated that date+timestamp was necessary. > Maybe that was just for the index, while the searches can be partial. DateRangeField was introduced fou

Re: Searching by dates

ot; at the end for the TZ. >>> >>> No user is ever going to do that. >> >> If you use the field class called DateRangeField, instead of the trie or >> point classes, you can get what you're after. >> >> It allows both searching and indexing dates as

Re: Searching by dates

ng 2018-08-16T00:00:00 plus maybe "Z" at the end for the TZ. >> >> No user is ever going to do that. > > If you use the field class called DateRangeField, instead of the trie or > point classes, you can get what you're after. > > It allows both searching an

Re: Searching by dates

I can't search for a DOB using e.g. 2018-08-16 but instead I need to >> search using 2018-08-16T00:00:00 plus maybe "Z" at the end for the TZ. >> >> No user is ever going to do that. > > If you use the field class called DateRangeField, instead of the trie or

Re: Searching by dates

Z. > > No user is ever going to do that. If you use the field class called DateRangeField, instead of the trie or point classes, you can get what you're after. It allows both searching and indexing dates as vague as "2018". https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/working-w

Searching by dates

All, My understanding is that Solr (really Lucene) only handles temporal data using full timestamps (date+time, always UTC). I have a use-case where I'd like to store and search for people by their birth dates, so the timestamp information is not relevant for me. I haven't actually tried this, ye

Re: Question regarding searching Chinese characters

Hi all, Thanks for this enlightening thread. As it happens, at Stanford Libraries we’re currently working on upgrading from Solr 4 to 7 and we’re looking forward to using the new dictionary-based word splitting in the ICUTokenizer. We have many of the same challenges as Amanda mentioned, and th

AW: indexing two words, searching single word

+1 ;) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Susheel Kumar Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2018 14:40 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: indexing two words, searching single word and as you suggested, use stop word before shingles... On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV

Re: indexing two words, searching single word

> Von: Clemens Wyss DEV > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2018 13:46 > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: AW: indexing two words, searching single word > > >Because you probably are not looking for "andthe" kind of tokens > (unfortunately) I guess I am,

AW: indexing two words, searching single word

seems to "work" -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Clemens Wyss DEV Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2018 13:46 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: AW: indexing two words, searching single word >Because you probably are not looking for "andthe" kind o

AW: indexing two words, searching single word

uot;-analyzer? I guess we could shingle after stop-word-filtering and I quess maxShingleSize="2" would suffice -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alexandre Rafalovitch Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2018 13:33 An: solr-user Betreff: Re: indexing two words, searching single word But w

Re: indexing two words, searching single word

maxGramSize="15" /> > > > I guess (besides the performance impact) this reduces search results > accuracy? > > -Clemens > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Markus Jelsma > Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2018 12:43 > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

AW: indexing two words, searching single word

accuracy? -Clemens -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Markus Jelsma Gesendet: Freitag, 3. August 2018 12:43 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: RE: indexing two words, searching single word Hello, If your case is English you could use synonyms to work around the problem of the few c

RE: indexing two words, searching single word

018 12:22 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: indexing two words, searching single word > > Sounds like a rather simple issue: > if I index "sound stage" and search for "soundstage" I get no hits > > What am I doing wrong > a) when indexing > b) when searching > ? > > Thx in advance > - Clemens >

indexing two words, searching single word

Sounds like a rather simple issue: if I index "sound stage" and search for "soundstage" I get no hits What am I doing wrong a) when indexing b) when searching ? Thx in advance - Clemens

Re: Alias field names when searching (not for results)

: > defType=edismax q=sysadmin name:Mike qf=title text last_name : > first_name : : Aside: I'm curious about the use of "qf", here. Since I didn't want my : users to have to specify any particular field to search, I created an : "all" field and dumped everything into it. It seems like it would

Re: Alias field names when searching (not for results)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Chris, On 7/24/18 1:40 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : So if I want to alias the "first_name" field to "first" and the : > "last_name" field to "last", then I would ... do what, exactly? > > se the last example here... > > https://lucene.apache.

Re: Alias field names when searching (not for results)

: So if I want to alias the "first_name" field to "first" and the : "last_name" field to "last", then I would ... do what, exactly? se the last example here... https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/the-extended-dismax-query-parser.html#examples-of-edismax-queries defType=edismax q=sysadmin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >