Possible... yes. Agreed that this is the right approach. But if we already have a big index that we're searching through? Any way to "hack it"?
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 14:55, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > I’d do that at index time. Add an update request processor script that > does the regex and adds a field has_credit_card_number:true. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > On Jul 28, 2020, at 11:50 AM, lstusr 5u93n4 <lstusr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Let's say I have a text field that's been indexed with the standard > > tokenizer, and I want to match the docs that have credit card numbers in > > them (this is for altruistic purposes, not nefarious ones!). What's the > > best way to build a search that will do this? > > > > Searching for "???? ???? ???? ????" seems to return inconsistent results. > > > > Maybe a regex search? "[0-9]{4}?[0-9]{4}?[0-9]{4}?[0-9]{4}" seems like it > > should work, but that's not matching the docs I think it should either... > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks In Advance! > >
