2013 06:38:09 -0800
> From: ml-node+s472066n4106382...@n3.nabble.com
> To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788
>
>
>
> Hi;
>
>
> Yes, I am talking about SOLR-788. There writes 4.1 so it means that it has
>
> fixed at 4.1. O
om
To: giuseppe_fe...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: SolrCloud and MoreLikeThis: SOLR-788
Hi;
Yes, I am talking about SOLR-788. There writes 4.1 so it means that it has
fixed at 4.1. On the other hand some patches are applied both for ongoing
versions and trunk. 5.0 is the trunk version of
Hi;
Yes, I am talking about SOLR-788. There writes 4.1 so it means that it has
fixed at 4.1. On the other hand some patches are applied both for ongoing
versions and trunk. 5.0 is the trunk version of Solr.
For your other question: what do you mean with: "where is document with
this id?&quo
Hi,
thanks for the answer, I think that you mean the issue SOLR-788, isn't it? if
yes, I think that it's solved as you say, but I see Fix Version/s:
x
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-and-MoreLikeThis-SOLR-788-tp4022581p4106258.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
6.
Thanks a lot in advance,
Giuseppe
P.S. Rakudten: Did you figure out the problem applying patch? Tx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-and-MoreLikeThis-SOLR-788-tp4022581p4106258.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
LT_RESULTS final static attributed in
>> ShardRequest.java.
>> > The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> >
>> > - Luis Cappa.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012/11/27 Luis Cappa Banda
>
tag but it exists a conflict
> > with PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS final static attributed in
> ShardRequest.java.
> > The thing is that it doesn´t exist, :-/ Any tips?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> > - Luis Cappa.
> >
> >
> > 2012/11/27 Luis C
>
> - Luis Cappa.
>
>
> 2012/11/27 Luis Cappa Banda
>
>> Hello, guys.
>>
>> Does anyone tested the latest
>> SOLR-788<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788> MLT
>> patch with Solr 4.0? It´s a very important Sorl feature that I
he latest
> SOLR-788<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788> MLT
> patch with Solr 4.0? It´s a very important Sorl feature that I would like
> to have in a SolrCloud environment. I use Eclipse as IDE, and I´m
> familiarized with Maven so it looks like I´ll spend one or t
Hello, guys.
Does anyone tested the latest
SOLR-788<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788> MLT
patch with Solr 4.0? It´s a very important Sorl feature that I would like
to have in a SolrCloud environment. I use Eclipse as IDE, and I´m
familiarized with Maven so it looks like I´ll
d for distributed More Like This. We're gearing up for a
deployment of 3.1, so a patch against 1.4.1 is not very useful for us.
I've spent the last couple of days trying to rework both the original
and the alternate patches on SOLR-788 to work against 3.1. I don't
understand enou
I tried some time ago to use SOLR-788. Ultimately I was able to get
both patch versions to apply (separately), but neither worked. The
suggestion I received when I commented on the issue was to download the
specific release mentioned in the patch and then update, but the patch
was created
On 5/17/2010 3:34 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I am looking at SOLR-788, trying to apply it to latest trunk. It
looks like that's going to require some rework, because the included
constant PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS conflicts with something added later,
PURPOSE_GET_TERMS.
How hard would it
I am looking at SOLR-788, trying to apply it to latest trunk. It looks
like that's going to require some rework, because the included constant
PURPOSE_GET_MLT_RESULTS conflicts with something added later,
PURPOSE_GET_TERMS.
How hard would it be to rework this to apply correctly to trunk
15 matches
Mail list logo
