Re: Replication of a corrupt master index

2014-12-02 Thread Erick Erickson
ards, > Johannes > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014 15:54 > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Replication of a corrupt master index > > No. The master is the maste

AW: Replication of a corrupt master index

2014-12-02 Thread Charra, Johannes
ht have a total outage. The master runs on a h/a cluster. Regards, Johannes -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014 15:54 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: Replication of a corrupt master index No. The

Re: Replication of a corrupt master index

2014-12-02 Thread Erick Erickson
No. The master is the master and will always stay the master unless you change it. This is one of the reasons I really like to keep the original source around in case I every have this problem. Best, Erick On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Charra, Johannes wrote: > > Hi, > > If I have a master/sla

Replication of a corrupt master index

2014-12-02 Thread Charra, Johannes
Hi, If I have a master/slave setup and the master index gets corrupted, will the slaves realize they should not replicate from the master anymore, since the master does not have a newer index version? I'm using Solr version 4.2.1. Regards, Johannes