ml#child-childdoctransformerfactory
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_5/transforming-result-documents.html#subquery
: Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 04:37:06 -0700 (MST)
: From: Venu
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Re: Solr facet order same as
Probably I haven't framed my question properly.
Consider the schema with the fields - id, sku, fc_id, group_id
The same SKU can be part of multiple documents with different fc_id and
group_id.
For a given search query, multiple documents having the same SKU will be
returned. Is there any way I ca
I have no idea what “getting the facets in the same order as the sort docs”
would mean.
Even in the single-valued case, say
idrankvalue_in_facet_field
doc1 1 32
doc2 2 76
doc3 33
doc4 4 76
How would facets be or
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/faceting.html#Faceting-Thefacet.mincountParameter
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Srinivas Kashyap <
srini...@tradestonesoftware.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a Solr collection which has around 20 fields(indexed and stored).
> When I turn on facet and m
After a bit of investigation, I am verifying I get over the double of qTime
for a single solr query on a distributed evnironment.
I will go into the details, but before I go into the code, is the unique
functionality going to be helped if we store docValues for the unique field
?
I have a cardinal
Hi Erick,
I believe I have found a solution and I am putting plenty of detail for
future reference. I have taken your previous advice and decided to add a
field (cancerTerms) and add in the terms there. But I am not doing this
outside of Solr. I am using the analysis chain and passing it through a
Sorry, I overlooked the ShingleFilterFactory.
You're getting that from, presumably, your
ShingleFilterFactory. Note that the minShingleSize=2
does not mean that only 2-shingles are output, there's
yet another parameter "outputUnigrams" that controls
that in combination with outputUnigramsIfNoShingl
Erick,
I am not sure when you say "the only available terms are "not" and
"necessarily"" is totally correct. I go into the schema browser and I can
see that there are two terms "not" and "not necessarily" with the correct
count. Unless these are not the terms you are talking about. Can you
explain
bq: so I cannot copy this field to a text field with a
keywordtokenizer or strfield
1> There is no restriction on whether a field is analyzed or not as far as
faceting is concerned. You can freely facet on an analyzed field
or String field or KeywordTokenized field. As Binoy says, though,
facetin
1) When faceting use field of type string. That'll rid you of your
tokenization problems.
Alternatively do not use any tokenizers.
Also turn doc values on for the field. It'll improve performance.
2) If however you do need to use a tokenized field for faceting, make sure
that they're pretty short i
I am not sure I am following correctly. The field I upload the document to
would be "content" the analyzed field is "ColonCancerField". The "content"
field contains the entire text of the document, in my case a pubmed
abstract. This is a tokenized field. I made this field untokenized and I
still re
Can you do the opposite? Index into an unanalyzed field and copy into the
analyzed?
If I remember correctly facets are based off of indexed values so if you
tokenize the field then the facets will be as you are seeing now.
On Dec 28, 2015 9:45 AM, "Kevin Lopez" wrote:
> *What I am trying to acc
I suggest you to take a look to Yonik blog and in particular to the new
Json Faceting approach and Nested document modelling.
Hope this can help :
http://yonik.com/solr-nested-objects/ ( nested objects )
http://yonik.com/json-facet-api/ ( nested facets)
Cheers
On 4 November 2015 at 12:15, Mugee
Thanks Erik
>>Shouldn't td have s2=1 also? yes was my mistake
I have also a search concern
I have a 3 table Resturant, Review,User
retuarant-[restid, restname,location...]
User-[userid, uname,]
Review-[reviewID, userid,restid,comment...]
I am searching based on restaurant, how could i will
Shouldn't td have s2=1 also? Try this:
facet.pivot=vi,vk
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 03:23, Mugeesh Husain wrote:
>
> i am facing issue of how to get below response from solr query.
>
> In my table, i have a two column vi and vk which has below values:
>
> row1: vi:["ta"] ,vk:["s1"]
> row2:
It would probably be better to do entity extraction and normalization of
job titles as a front-end process before ingesting the data into Solr, but
you could also do it as a custom or script update processor. The latter can
be easily coded in JavaScript to run within Solr
Your first step in any ca
On 1/28/2015 3:56 AM, thakkar.aayush wrote:
> I have around 1 million job titles which are indexed on Solr and am looking
> to improve the faceted search results on job title matches.
>
> For example: a job search for *Research Scientist Computer Architecture* is
> made, and the facet field title
Hoss created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5383
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-facet-field-counts-not-correct-tp4097305p4097346.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
: if I do group=false&group.facet=false the counts are what they should be for
: the ungrouped counts... seems like group.facet isn't working correctly
yeah ... thanks for digging int -- definitely seems like a problem with
group.facet and Trie fields that use precisionStep.
I've opened a Jira:
if I do group=false&group.facet=false the counts are what they should be for
the ungrouped counts... seems like group.facet isn't working correctly
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-facet-field-counts-not-correct-tp4097305p4097314.html
Sent from the Solr -
Here is my query String:
/solr/singleproductindex/productQuery?fq=siteid:82&q=categories_82_is:109124&facet=true&facet.query=HeatingArea_numeric:[0%20TO%20*]&facet.field=HeatingArea_numeric&debugQuery=true
Here is my schema for that field:
Here is my request handler definition:
: Actual requirement is to get day wise total no. of counts for multiple
: terms.
the approach you described in your original mail (using multiple fqs to
identify your terms, and using multiple facet.range requests on the date
field with differnet exclusions) will work fine.
the confusing part
There's nothing like that built in that I know
of, the closest in concept is "pivot faceting"
but that doesn't work in this case.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:13 AM, vrparekh wrote:
> Thanks Erick,
>
> yes example url i provided is bit confusing, sorry for that.
>
> Actual requirement is
Thanks Erick,
yes example url i provided is bit confusing, sorry for that.
Actual requirement is to get day wise total no. of counts for multiple
terms.
if we use q=(firstterm OR
secondterm)&facet.query=firstterm&facet.query=secondTerm. It will provide
total no. of records count for both search
I'm a little confused here. Faceting is about counting docs that meet
your query restrictions. I.e. the "q=" and "fq=" clauses. So your original
problem statement simply cannot be combined into a single query
since your q= clauses are different. You could do something like
q=(firstterm OR secondter
: select?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.zeros=false&fq=column1:(16 31)&&fq=COLUMN2:(6
:
208)&fq={!tag=COLUMN2,column1}COLUMN2:(6)&facet.field={!ex=COLUMN2,column1}COLUMN2&start=0&rows=0
As erick said, you need to elaborate more on what you expect, what you
get, and how they are differnet.
taking a wil
_how_ is it not working? You might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:37 AM, lavesh wrote:
> select?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.zeros=false&fq=column1:(16 31)&&fq=COLUMN2:(6
> 208)&fq={!tag=COLUMN2,column1}COLUMN2:(6)&facet.field={!ex=COLUMN2,col
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:04 AM, lavesh wrote:
> I know this is possible in Solr which do the grouping irrespective of one
> values. i.e below line do the grouping based on column1 considering all
> filters except the column column1
>
> &facet.field={!ex=column1}column1
>
> now i wana know can i d
NP, glad it's working for you!
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 8:26 AM, davidbougearel
wrote:
> I have tried and it works !
>
> Thanks again a lot for this dude !
>
> Regards,
> David.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-facet-multiple-constraint-tp399297
I have tried and it works !
Thanks again a lot for this dude !
Regards,
David.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-facet-multiple-constraint-tp3992974p3996189.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ok it's nice a facet query, i will try this feature and will reply you but i
think that's the point, thanks a lot for time spent :)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-facet-multiple-constraint-tp3992974p3996186.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list ar
OK, maybe I'm finally getting it. When you do a facet.field=blahblah, you're
telling Solr to take all the documents that match the query, look in field
blahblah, and tally the documents that match _any_ value in the field. There's
no restriction at all on the _values_ that that tally is made for.
Ok i'm added the debug, there is the query from the response after executing
query :
facet=true,sort=publishingdate
desc,debugQuery=true,facet.mincount=1,q=service:1 AND
publicationstatus:LIVE,facet.field=pillar,wt=javabin,fq=(((pillar:10))),version=2}},response={numFound=2,start=0,docs=[SolrDocum
What do you get when you attach &debugQuery=on? That should show you the parsed
query. You might paste that.
Erick
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:14 AM, davidbougearel
wrote:
> Ok well i know about the complexity that i can put into fq with AND and OR
> conditions but at the moment when i put fq=user
Ok well i know about the complexity that i can put into fq with AND and OR
conditions but at the moment when i put fq=user:10,facet.field=user, the
query returns me all the facets not taking into account the fq=user:10
that's the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.n
Sure, you can have as complex an FQ clause as you need.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:48 AM, davidbougearel
wrote:
> Ok this is the id but in fact (sorry about this) my wish is the reverse, i
> want to get just the facet for which a have the right so i want to put
> fq=user:10 in order to
Ok this is the id but in fact (sorry about this) my wish is the reverse, i
want to get just the facet for which a have the right so i want to put
fq=user:10 in order to get only facet with user:10.
In my fq i can have something like user:10 AND user:3 because it's auto
generated by rights of my ap
OK, would it work just add an fq clause fq=-user:10? Or, depending on your Solr,
fq=*:* -user:10?
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:45 AM, davidbougearel
wrote:
> Ok sorry to not be clear and thanks again for your answers.
>
> q=service%3A1+AND+publicationstatus%3ALIVE&sort=publishingdate+des
Ok sorry to not be clear and thanks again for your answers.
q=service%3A1+AND+publicationstatus%3ALIVE&sort=publishingdate+desc&fq=%7B%21ex%3Ddt%7D%28%28%28user%3A10%29%29%29&facet.field=%7B%21tag%3Ddt%7Duser&facet=true&facet.mincount=1
Here with this query i want to get all the documents (the el
You still haven't given a clear (at least to me) statement of
what you see and what about it isn't what you expect. Please
give some concrete examples.
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 3:45 AM, davidbougearel
wrote:
> Thanks for answer,
>
> Actually when i put 'it's not working' it means that i
Thanks for answer,
Actually when i put 'it's not working' it means that it's not the result
expected : the result return me data tagged by all the facets not only the
facet that i ask for with the constraint.
Hope you will help me.
Best regards,
David.
--
View this message in context:
http://
Solr faceting only counts documents that satisfy the query. Think of it
as assembling a list of all possible values for a field and then adding
1 for each value found in each document that satisfies the overall
query (including the filter query). So you can get counts of 0, that's
expected. Adding
What does "doesn't work" mean? returning no results? Not returning facets?
returning incorrect facet counts?
You might review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:37 AM, davidbougearel
wrote:
> Well thanks for your answer, in fact i've written what
Well thanks for your answer, in fact i've written what the QueryResponse
return as the solr query here is my real solr query before use the
executeQuery :
q=service%3A1+AND+publicationstatus%3ALIVE&sort=publishingdate+desc&fq=%7B%21ex%3Ddt%7D%28%28%28user%3A10%29%29%29&facet.field=%7B%21tag%3Ddt%7
Well, to start with this query is totally messed up.
facet=true,sort=publishingdate desc,facet.mincount=1,q=service:1 AND
publicationstatus:LIVE,facet.field={!ex=dt}user,wt=javabin,fq={!tag=dt}user:10,version=2
You've put in commas where you should have ampersands to separate
parameters=value pai
Please someone can help me,
we are a team waiting for a fix.
We try several ways to implement it without success.
Thanks for reading anyway, David.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-facet-multiple-constraint-tp3992974p3993119.html
Sent from the Solr - Use
: I would like to use solr facets with multi-word queries, is it possible
: I mainly implement a suggest application and use facet.prefix parameter,
: it works fine with single word but not with multiple words
it depends on your definition of "works" ? .. do you want each word to be
a seperate
47 matches
Mail list logo
