Thanks for your Answer.
this is what I am trying to do :
I would like to find out how to customize the Lucene Indexing Prozess to
obtain a faster search.
etheir with Luke or with some other tool.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> please don't hijack topic threads, start a
please don't hijack topic threads, start a new one
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thread_hijacking
Best
Erick
MergeFactor isn't very related to searching, Luke isn't used in
the indexing process and why do you care how fast Luke is?
When you start a new post on this topic, please give an idea of
How fast is the search if the MergeFactor of Lucene Index is set to 20 or
more?did somebody uses Luke to optimize the indexing process? I would like
to know how fast is Luke.
Thanks
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ian Connor wrote:
> When you query by *:*, what order does it use. Is there a ch
*:* will default to sorting by document insertion order (Lucene's
document id, _not_ your Solr uniqueKey). And no, you won't miss any
by paging - order will be maintained.
Erik
On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Ian Connor wrote:
When you query by *:*, what order does it use. Is there a
When you query by *:*, what order does it use. Is there a chance they will
come in a different order as you page through the results (and miss/dupicate
some). Is it best to put the order explicitly by 'id' or is that implied
already?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ian Connor wrote:
> *:* took
*:* took it up to 45/sec from 28/sec so a nice 60% bump in performance -
thanks!
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> I don't know of any standard export/import tool -- i think luke has
> something, but it will be faster if you write your own.
>
> Rather then id:[* TO *], just
I have about 2.5 million per shard and seem to be getting through 28/sec
using a 1000 at a time. It ran all yesterday and part of the night. It is
over the 1.6 million mark now so hope it can keep up a similar rate as it
gets deeper into the index.
I need to reindex it all because I changed how so
I kinda don't get why would you reindex all data at once?
Each document has unique id you will reindex only whats needed. Also
if too many stuff I'd suggest using some
batch processor that will add N tasks with range query 1:10 10:20
etc... and cronjob executing those. Thousends seems ok but w
I don't know of any standard export/import tool -- i think luke has
something, but it will be faster if you write your own.
Rather then id:[* TO *], just try *:* -- this should match all
documents without using a range query.
On Jan 25, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Ian Connor wrote:
Hi,
Given the
