How fast is the search if the MergeFactor of Lucene Index is set to 20 or more?did somebody uses Luke to optimize the indexing process? I would like to know how fast is Luke. Thanks
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Ian Connor <ian.con...@gmail.com> wrote: > When you query by *:*, what order does it use. Is there a chance they will > come in a different order as you page through the results (and > miss/dupicate > some). Is it best to put the order explicitly by 'id' or is that implied > already? > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ian Connor <ian.con...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > *:* took it up to 45/sec from 28/sec so a nice 60% bump in performance - > > thanks! > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Ryan McKinley <ryan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> I don't know of any standard export/import tool -- i think luke has > >> something, but it will be faster if you write your own. > >> > >> Rather then id:[* TO *], just try *:* -- this should match all > documents > >> without using a range query. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Jan 25, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Ian Connor wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >>> > >>> Given the only real way to reindex is to save the document again, what > is > >>> the fastest way to extract all the documents from a solr index to > resave > >>> them. > >>> > >>> I have tried the id:[* TO *] trick however, it takes a while once you > get > >>> a > >>> few thousand into the index. Are there any tools that will quickly > export > >>> the index to a text file or making queries 1000 at a time is the best > >>> option > >>> and dealing with the time it takes to query once you are deep into the > >>> index? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Ian Connor > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Ian Connor > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Ian Connor > 1 Leighton St #723 > Cambridge, MA 02141 > Call Center Phone: +1 (714) 239 3875 (24 hrs) > Fax: +1(770) 818 5697 > Skype: ian.connor >
