On 10/25/2013 8:18 AM, Cassandra Targett wrote:
In terms of adding or fixing documentation, the "Installing Solr" page
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Installing+Solr)
includes a yellow box that says:
"Solr ships with a working Jetty server, with optimized settings for
Solr, i
Things have actually improved quite a bit in that area. There have been many
optimizations and additional ways to create large data structures off heap
added in recent releases.
Someday G1 might even help a bit.
- Mark
On Oct 25, 2013, at 7:20 PM, Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
> I (jokingly) propo
I (jokingly) propose we take it a step further and drop Java :)! I'm
getting tired of trying to scale GC'ing JVMs!
Tim
On 25/10/13 09:02 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
Just to add to the “use jetty for Solr” argument - Solr 5.0 will no longer
consider itself a webapp and will consider the fact that J
Just to add to the “use jetty for Solr” argument - Solr 5.0 will no longer
consider itself a webapp and will consider the fact that Jetty is a used an
implementation detail.
We won’t necessarily make it impossible to use a different container, but the
project won’t condone it or support it and
In terms of adding or fixing documentation, the "Installing Solr" page
(https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Installing+Solr)
includes a yellow box that says:
"Solr ships with a working Jetty server, with optimized settings for
Solr, inside the example directory. It is recommended that
Hmm, thats an interesting move. I'm on the fence on that one but it surely
simplifies some things. Good info, thanks!
Tim
On 24 October 2013 16:46, Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Thought you may want to have a look at this:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4792
>
> P.S: There are no timel
Thought you may want to have a look at this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4792
P.S: There are no timelines for 5.0 for now, but it's the future
nevertheless.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
> I agree with Jonathan (and Shawn on the Jetty explanation), I
I agree with Jonathan (and Shawn on the Jetty explanation), I think the
docs should make this a bit more clear - I notice many people choosing
Tomcat and then learning these details after, possibly regretting it.
I'd be glad to modify the docs but I want to be careful how it is worded.
Is it fair
This is good to know, and I find it welcome advice; I would recommend
making sure this advice is clearly highlighted in the relevant Solr
docs, such as any getting started docs.
I'm not sure everyone realizes this, and some go down tomcat route
without realizing the Solr committers recommend j
On 10/20/2013 2:57 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> We recommend jetty. The solr example uses jetty.
I have a clarification for this statement. We actually recommend using
the jetty that's included in the Solr 4.x example. It is stripped of
all unnecessary features and its config has had some minor tu
On 10/20/2013 11:23 AM, Karunakar Reddy wrote:
> I want to know what is the difference between running solr on tomcat-apache
> server vs jetty server in production.
> With jetty there is some issue with indexing(eg: If 120k[batch size 100]
> records are getting indexed, around 15k are missing).
We
Which Jira issue points for: "With jetty there is some issue with
indexing(eg: If 120k[batch size 100] records are getting indexed, around
15k are missing)."?
2013/10/20 Karunakar Reddy
> Hi,
> I want to know what is the difference between running solr on tomcat-apache
> server vs jetty server
12 matches
Mail list logo
