TermCount
> for more information.
>
> James Dyer
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Mongeau [mailto:halogenandto...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:23 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re
n.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Matt Mongeau [mailto:halogenandto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 10:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: WordBreakSolrSpellChecker Usage
I think you were right about maxChanges, that doe
ling is because you
>> have "maxChanges" set to 10. This tells it you are willing for it to break
>> a word into 10 separate parts, or to combine up to 10 adjacent words into
>> 1. Having taken a quick glance at the code, I think what is happening is
>> it is trying thin
arts, or to combine up to 10 adjacent words into
> 1. Having taken a quick glance at the code, I think what is happening is
> it is trying things like "r ock p oint" and "r o ck p o int", etc and never
> getting to your intended result. In a typical scenario I would set
> &qu
nandto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: WordBreakSolrSpellChecker Usage
Is there a suggested value for this. I bumped them up to 20 and still
nothing has seemed to change.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Dyer, James
wrote:
> M
Is there a suggested value for this. I bumped them up to 20 and still
nothing has seemed to change.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Dyer, James
wrote:
> My first guess here, is seeing it works some of the time but not others,
> is that these values are too low:
>
> 5
> 5
>
> You know spellcheck
My first guess here, is seeing it works some of the time but not others, is
that these values are too low:
5
5
You know spellcheck.count is too low if the suggestion you want is not in the
"suggestions" part of the response, but increasing it makes it get included.
You know that spellcheck.ma
