Thanks Mikhail,
I will check this FieldMaskingSpanQuery out.
Thanks
Melchi
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 19:17, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
>
> There's no way to search with positions across other fields. I can only
> recommend to prepend prefix terms to distinguish them.
> But hold on, what about FieldMas
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your reply. I am keeping the original with the edge, but not
sure how to mark them as original. I would like to avoid a prefix match
for the full words.
You mentioned post-filter - can you shed some light on this?. If only I
can remove these over-matches, that would be great
Thanks Erick for your inputs,
Yes, i was indeed looking for this. I was little worried about the *
expansion. As it is already part of a large query. But this sounds like
the simplest way I can achieve this for now.
If I indeed slows down, will revisit this.
Was wondering if some how I can cre
There's no way to search with positions across other fields. I can only
recommend to prepend prefix terms to distinguish them.
But hold on, what about FieldMaskingSpanQuery? It's available in
XMLQparser, you may try.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:37 AM NewMelchizedec sundararaj
wrote:
> Hi Fellow Se
It is not clear how much flexibility you expect in those queries. Can
the second word never be full name? Can there be more than 2 words?
How do you know the length of the prefix? When you say prefix, do you
mean 'jo' is expected to match 'joseph'?
So, just generically, I would say why not index e
There's no capability in Solr to do this. Given that different fields
have different analyzer chains, how would position information be
preserved across two fields? It'd be tricky at best.
ComplexPhrase should do what you want by itself, assuming you want
matches for any doc with "steve jobs", "st
