Thanks Erick for your inputs,
Yes, i was indeed looking for this. I was little worried about the *
expansion. As it is already part of a large query. But this sounds like
the simplest way I can achieve this for now.
If I indeed slows down, will revisit this.
Was wondering if some how I can create a spanterm from different fields, I
should be able to position limit them using span aware parsers. Sorry, if
I am just day dreaming.
Thanks
Melchi
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 08:18, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> There's no capability in Solr to do this. Given that different fields
> have different analyzer chains, how would position information be
> preserved across two fields? It'd be tricky at best.
>
> ComplexPhrase should do what you want by itself, assuming you want
> matches for any doc with "steve jobs", "steve johns", "steve johnson"
> etc.. Just search for name_term:"steve jo*"
>
> Best,
> Erick
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 4:37 PM NewMelchizedec sundararaj
> <mel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Fellow Searchers,
> >
> > I am indexing some content (say name) in to two fields with different
> > analyzer chains. One that would do edge prefix and the other regular
> > tokenization.
> > Let me call them name_prefix and name_term
> >
> > When an incoming partial query comes up, like "steve jo", I want the
> > first word to be searched in regular index while the jo to go to
> > prefix index.
> >
> > something like
> > name_term:steve AND name_prefix:jo
> >
> > works.
> >
> > But I would like to use them in a phrase. i.e. expect them to be next
> > to each other. Following are the things attempted. with out success.
> >
> > 1. regular phrase: "name_term:steve name_prefix:jo" - does not expect
> > field names.
> > 2. complex phrase query: {!complexphrase inOrder=true}"name_term:steve
> > name_prefix:jo" - does not allow different field names in the same
> > phrase.
> > 3. played around with {!surround}3w(name_term:steve,name_prefix:jo) -
> > does not support subquery (field names).
> >
> > Any other way this can be accomplished?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Melchi
>
--
