better using longs I’ll
> stick with the strings.
>
>
> Thanks for your help Mikhail and Upayavira now I just need to get the
> firm to move to 5.3 ☺
>
> Russ.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikhail Khludnev [mailto:mkhlud...@griddynamics.com]
> Sent
>
> Thanks for your help Mikhail and Upayavira now I just need to get the firm
> to move to 5.3 ☺
>
> Russ.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mikhail Khludnev [mailto:mkhlud...@griddynamics.com]
> Sent: 14 September 2015 15:54
> To: solr-user
> Subject: Re: Solr
--
From: Mikhail Khludnev [mailto:mkhlud...@griddynamics.com]
Sent: 14 September 2015 15:54
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Solr Join between two indexes taking too long.
Why? It's enough to just open index by Solr 5.3 instance. No need to reindex.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Russell
Russ.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell Taylor
> Sent: 11 September 2015 14:00
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr Join between two indexes taking too long.
>
> It will take a little while to set-up a 5.3 vers
Looks like I won't be able to test this out on 5.3.
Thanks for all your help.
Russ.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Taylor
Sent: 11 September 2015 14:00
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr Join between two indexes taking too long.
It will take a little while to set
It will take a little while to set-up a 5.3 version, hopefully I'll have some
results later next week.
From: Mikhail Khludnev [mkhlud...@griddynamics.com]
Sent: 11 September 2015 12:59
To: Russell Taylor
Subject: Re: Solr Join between two indexes taking too
I'll try that Thanks Upayavira.
From: Upayavira [u...@odoko.co.uk]
Sent: 09 September 2015 19:30
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Join between two indexes taking too long.
I've never reviewed that join query debug info - very i
from=longValue to=longValue
> > fromIndex=indexB}universe:LARGE",
> > "parsedquery": "JoinQuery({!join from=longValue to=longValue
> > fromIndex=indexB}universe:LARGE)",
> > "parsedquery_toString": "{!join from=longValue to=longValue
> > fromIndex=indexB}universe:LAR
;200076769985": "\n1.0 = (MATCH)
> org.apache.solr.search.JoinQuery$JoinQueryWeight@7a5d18ac , product
> of:\n 1.0 = boost\n 1.0 = queryNorm\n",
> "200076769986": "\n1.0 = (MATCH)
> org.apache.solr.search.JoinQuery$JoinQueryWeight@6d601adc , pr
che.solr.search.JoinQuery$JoinQueryWeight@118f9aef , product
> of:\n 1.0 = boost\n 1.0 = queryNorm\n",
> "200076769985": "\n1.0 = (MATCH)
> org.apache.solr.search.JoinQuery$JoinQueryWeight@7a5d18ac , product
> of:\n 1.0 = boost\n 1.0
rg.apache.solr.search.JoinQuery$JoinQueryWeight@6d601adc , product of:\n 1.0
= boost\n 1.0 = queryNorm\n",
"200076769987": "\n1.0 = (MATCH)
org.apache.solr.search.JoinQuery$JoinQueryWeight@2e262f31 , product of:\n 1.0
= boost\n 1.0 = queryNorm\n",
"2
To explain what a join does:
It goes over to the joined index, and executes a query. This results in
a list of "ids" that will be used to do a search on the main index. The
more of these ids there are, the worse performance will be. Thus, if you
have 100k documents that match in the join core, you
uent
changes to the start parameter are fast?
Thanks
Russ.
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev [mailto:mkhlud...@griddynamics.com]
Sent: 08 September 2015 23:08
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Solr Join between two indexes taking too long.
Hello Russ,
It's an inter
Hello Russ,
It's an interesting case! Can you get a brief context?
- is it possible to keep both type of data at the same core? Why not?
- can you manually shard both indices by those longValues?
- It seems like you query a plenty of data, don't you have another
query/filter to intersect that join
14 matches
Mail list logo
