Re: Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread John Blythe
That's why i provide my email :) already spoke w several people at fusion and was hoping to pick your brain in particular. Thanks anyway tho, the info was helpful! best, -- John Blythe On Feb 5, 2016, 8:44 AM -0500, Erik Hatcher, wrote: > John - best to not have non-Solr discussions on the lis

Re: Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread Erik Hatcher
John - best to not have non-Solr discussions on the list, but feel free to reach out to us at Lucidworks to connect further about it. — Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect http://www.lucidworks.com > On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:34 AM, John Blythe wrote: > > hey er

Re: Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread John Blythe
hey erick, thanks for this. if it's not against the newsletters policy, and is alright w you in general, i'd love to have a side discussion about LW/Fusion. j...@curvolabs.com best, -- *John Blythe* Product Manager & Lead Developer 251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com www.curvolabs.com 58 Adams

Re: Signals and scoring

2016-02-05 Thread Erik Hatcher
There’s several moving pieces to Fusion’s signals processing, so we’d certainly encourage you to try Fusion out yourself and not reinvent these wheels :) But here’s the general gist of how it works: - events/signals/clicks are logged (to a separate Solr collection) - periodically jobs run t