Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for

2010-10-11 Thread Dennis Gearon
; From: Erick Erickson > Subject: Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 8:11 AM > The phrase that jumps out is "with > fields slightly modified". I'm > guessing that your modifications are

Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for

2010-10-10 Thread Dennis Gearon
make them yourself. from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' EARTH has a Right To Life, otherwise we all die. --- On Sun, 10/10/10, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > From: Otis Gospodnetic > Subject: Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for > To: s

Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for

2010-10-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Gearon > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sun, October 10, 2010 8:47:29 PM > Subject: Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for > > Thanks for answering on a Sunday :-) > > What happens if the query returns extra fields that are not specified in the >config.xml?

Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for

2010-10-10 Thread Dennis Gearon
ick Erickson > Subject: Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 8:11 AM > The phrase that jumps out is "with > fields slightly modified". I'm > guessing that your modifications are off by a

Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for

2010-10-10 Thread Erick Erickson
The phrase that jumps out is "with fields slightly modified". I'm guessing that your modifications are off by a little. Here's what I'd check first: 1> check the case. Sometimes the DB <-> field link is case sensitive. 2> Look in your index via the admin page and look at your actual fields as repor