Thanks for answering on a Sunday :-) What happens if the query returns extra fields that are not specified in the config.xml?
And does the unque field have to be named 'id'? Dennis Gearon Signature Warning ---------------- It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself. from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' EARTH has a Right To Life, otherwise we all die. --- On Sun, 10/10/10, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Records from DIH not easily queried for > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Sunday, October 10, 2010, 8:11 AM > The phrase that jumps out is "with > fields slightly modified". I'm > guessing that your modifications are off by a little. > Here's what > I'd check first: > 1> check the case. Sometimes the DB <-> field link > is case > sensitive. > 2> Look in your index via the admin page and look at > your actual > fields as reported there. Are they really what you expect? > 3> Try your query with &debugQuery=on. Is what you > get back > what you expect? > 4> Sometimes your browser cache will fool you, try the > force-refresh > combination on your browser. > > There's no magic here, nothing special or different about > DIH > imported data than any other sort. So it's almost > certainly > some innocent-seeming change that's not, typo, incorrect > assumption, etc. > > If none of that works, you need to post your schema changes > and > your query results (with &debugQuery=on). Particularly, > post > the fieldType definitions as well as your field > definitions... > > Best > Erick > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Dennis Gearon <gear...@sbcglobal.net>wrote: > > > With a brand new setup, per the demo/tutorial, with > fields slightly changed > > in the config and data, posting XML records results in > a simple qiery being > > able to find records. > > > > > > But records imported via a plain jane DIH request can > only be found using > > 'q=*:*' queries. > > > > There's no filtering, tokenizing, blah blah. It's the > factory settings. The > > installation is as new at this as we are :-) > > > > Anyone have any ideas why we can't query for DIH > handled records? Do they > > have some magic juju done to them that XML Posts > don't, or visa versa? > > > > Dennis Gearon > > > > Signature Warning > > ---------------- > > It is always a good idea to learn from your own > mistakes. It is usually a > > better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you > do not have to make them > > yourself. from ' > > http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036' > > > > EARTH has a Right To Life, > > otherwise we all die. > > >
