On 3/24/2014 9:48 AM, David Flower wrote:
Its not saw toothing though it’s sitting solidly at 52%
It may be very difficult to see the sawtooth effect unless you actually
connect an app like jconsole to your running Solr instance and watch the
graphs over time.
My point was that what you've
Its not saw toothing though it’s sitting solidly at 52%
On 24/03/2014 15:46, "Shawn Heisey" wrote:
>> I¹m looking at dashboard page on all 4 nodes and seeing
>> Physical Memory 92% compared with ~41-44%
>>
>> And JVM-Memory 52.9% compared to 23-28%
>>
>> The reason I mentioned slave is that on t
> I¹m looking at dashboard page on all 4 nodes and seeing
> Physical Memory 92% compared with ~41-44%
>
> And JVM-Memory 52.9% compared to 23-28%
>
> The reason I mentioned slave is that on the core overview page there is
> An entry for Slave (Searching) that doesn¹t appear on any of the other
> no
I¹m looking at dashboard page on all 4 nodes and seeing
Physical Memory 92% compared with ~41-44%
And JVM-Memory 52.9% compared to 23-28%
The reason I mentioned slave is that on the core overview page there is
An entry for Slave (Searching) that doesn¹t appear on any of the other
nodes
Cheers,
D
On 3/24/2014 7:15 AM, David Flower wrote:
> We have a 4 node cluster with a collection thats sharded into 2 and each
> shard having a master and a slave for redundancy however 1 node has decied
> to use twice the ram that the others are using within the cluster
>
> The only difference we can spot
We¹re still on 4.4.0
David
On 24/03/2014 13:19, "Furkan KAMACI" wrote:
>Hi David;
>
>Which version of Solr you are using?
>
>Thanks;
>Furkan KAMACI
>
>
>2014-03-24 15:15 GMT+02:00 David Flower :
>
>> Hi All
>>
>> We have a 4 node cluster with a collection thats sharded into 2 and each
>> shard
Hi David;
Which version of Solr you are using?
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
2014-03-24 15:15 GMT+02:00 David Flower :
> Hi All
>
> We have a 4 node cluster with a collection thats sharded into 2 and each
> shard having a master and a slave for redundancy however 1 node has decied
> to use twice the r
On 7/29/2013 1:12 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> When I look at my dashboard I see that 27.30 GB available for JVM, 24.77
> GB is gray and 16.50 GB is black. I don't do anything on my machine right
> now. Did it cache documents or is there any problem, how can I learn it?
This is simple information
On 12/13/2010 9:46 PM, Cameron Hurst wrote:
When i start the server I am using about 90MB of RAM which is fine and
from the google searches I found that is normal. The issue comes when I
start indexing data. In my solrconf.xml file that my maximum RAM buffer
is 32MB. In my mind that means that th
Several observations:
1> If by RAM buffer size you're referring to the value in solrconfig.xml,
,
that is a limit on the size of the internal buffer while indexing. When
that limit is reached
the data is flushed to disk. It is irrelevant to searching.
2> When you run searches, various inter
10 matches
Mail list logo
