Ah, thanks for letting us know.
Erick
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:20 AM, Bjarke Buur Mortensen
> wrote:
>
> The section without type is the one getting picked up for the
> index-time chain, so that wasn't my problem.
>
> It turns out that because of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCEN
The section without type is the one getting picked up for the
index-time chain, so that wasn't my problem.
It turns out that because of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8134, I needed to add
a omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" to the declaration.
This has to do with defaults for a stri
Not sure. You have an
section and
section. Frankly I’m not sure which one will be used for the index-time chain.
Why don’t you just try it?
change
to
reload and go. It’d take you 5 minutes and you’d have your answer.
Best,
Erick
> On Aug 28, 2019, at 1:57 AM, Bjarke Buur Mortensen
> w
Yes, but isn't that what I am already doing in this case (look at the
fieldType in the original mail)?
Is there some other way to specify that field type and achieve what I want?
Thanks,
Bjarke
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 17:32 Erick Erickson wrote:
> You can have separate index and query time analys
You can have separate index and query time analysis chains, there are many
examples in the stock Solr schemas.
Best,
Erick
> On Aug 27, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Bjarke Buur Mortensen
> wrote:
>
> We have a solr file of type "string".
> It turns out that we need to do synonym expansion on query time
