Ah, thanks for letting us know. Erick
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 9:20 AM, Bjarke Buur Mortensen <morten...@eluence.com> > wrote: > > The <analyzer> section without type is the one getting picked up for the > index-time chain, so that wasn't my problem. > > It turns out that because of > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8134, I needed to add > a omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" to the <fieldType> declaration. > This has to do with defaults for a string field being different from a text > field, and i Solr 8+ indexing fails because of above ticket. > Adding omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" ensures that index field type and > the schema field type agree on the settings, as I understand it. > > Regards, > Bjarke > > > > Den ons. 28. aug. 2019 kl. 13.26 skrev Erick Erickson < > erickerick...@gmail.com>: > >> Not sure. You have an >> <analyzer> >> section and >> <analyzer=“query”> >> >> section. Frankly I’m not sure which one will be used for the index-time >> chain. >> >> Why don’t you just try it? >> change >> <analyzer> >> to >> <analyzer=“index”> >> >> reload and go. It’d take you 5 minutes and you’d have your answer. >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> >>> On Aug 28, 2019, at 1:57 AM, Bjarke Buur Mortensen < >> morten...@eluence.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, but isn't that what I am already doing in this case (look at the >>> fieldType in the original mail)? >>> Is there some other way to specify that field type and achieve what I >> want? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Bjarke >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 17:32 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>>> You can have separate index and query time analysis chains, there are >> many >>>> examples in the stock Solr schemas. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Erick >>>> >>>>> On Aug 27, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Bjarke Buur Mortensen < >>>> morten...@eluence.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We have a solr file of type "string". >>>>> It turns out that we need to do synonym expansion on query time in >> order >>>> to >>>>> account for some changes over time in the values stored in that field. >>>>> >>>>> So we have tried introducing a custom fieldType that applies the >> synonym >>>>> filter at query time only (see bottom of mail), but that requires us to >>>>> change the field. But now, when we index new documents, Solr complains: >>>>> 400 Bad Request >>>>> Error: 'Exception writing document id someid to the index; possible >>>>> analysis error: cannot change field "auth_country_code" from index >>>>> options=DOCS to inconsistent index >> options=DOCS_AND_FREQS_AND_POSITIONS', >>>>> >>>>> Since we are only making query time changes, I would really like to not >>>>> have to reindex our entire collection. Is that possible somehow? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Bjarke >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <fieldType name="country_codes" class="solr.TextField" >>>>> sortMissingLast="true" positionIncrementGap="100"> >>>>> <analyzer> >>>>> <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> <!-- no >>>>> splitting of input --> >>>>> </analyzer> >>>>> <analyzer type="query"> >>>>> <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> >>>>> <filter class="solr.SynonymGraphFilterFactory" >>>>> synonyms="country-synonyms.txt" ignoreCase="false" expand="true"/> >>>>> </analyzer> >>>>> </fieldType> >>>> >>>> >> >>
