On Jul 10, 2013, at 4:39 AM, Daniel Collins wrote:
> QueryNorm is what I'm still trying to get to the bottom of exactly :)
If you have not seen it, some reading from the past here…
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896
- Mark
Norms stay in the index even if you delete all of the data. If you just
changed the schema, emptied the index, and tested again, you've still
got norms in there.
You can examine the index with Luke to verify this.
On 07/09/2013 08:57 PM, William Bell wrote:
I have a field that has omitNorms=t
Thanks.
Yeah I don't really want the queryNorm on
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Collins wrote:
> I don't know the full answer to your question, but here's what I can offer.
>
> Solr offers 2 types of normalisation, FieldNorm and QueryNorm. FieldNorm
> is as the name suggests fiel
I don't know the full answer to your question, but here's what I can offer.
Solr offers 2 types of normalisation, FieldNorm and QueryNorm. FieldNorm
is as the name suggests field level normalisation, based on length of the
field, and can be controlled by the omitNorms parameter on the field. In
Hi Ashmet,
You're right. It was related to the text field which is the defaultSearch
field. I also added omitNorms=true in the fieldtype definition and it's now
working as expected
Thanks,
Adolfo.
It seems that fieldNorm difference is coming from the field named 'text'. And
you didn't include the definition of text field. Did you omit norms for that
field too?
By the way I see that you have store="true" in some places but it should be
store*d*="true".
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Adolfo Castro
