Bram Van Dam wrote
> On 09/29/2013 04:03 PM, adfel70 wrote:
> If you're doing real time on a 5TB index then you'll probably want to
> throw your money at the fastest storage you can afford (SSDs vs spinning
> rust made a huge difference in our benchmarks) and the fastest CPUs you
> can get your
On 9/29/2013 7:21 AM, adfel70 wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm thinking of solr cluster architecture before purchasing machines.
>
>
> My total index size is around 5TB. I want to have replication factor of 3.
> total 15TB.
> I've understood that I should have 50-100% of the index size as ram, for OS
> cache.
On 09/29/2013 04:03 PM, adfel70 wrote:
How can I configure the disk storage so that disk access is optimized?
I'm considering having RAID-10
and I think I'll have arround 4-8 disks per machine.
Should I run each solr jvm to point on a datadir on differnet disks, or is
there some other way to opti
How can I configure the disk storage so that disk access is optimized?
I'm considering having RAID-10
and I think I'll have arround 4-8 disks per machine.
Should I run each solr jvm to point on a datadir on differnet disks, or is
there some other way to optimize this?
Erick Erickson wrote
> bq:
bq: is there an upper limit of amount of solr processes per machine,
No, assuming they're all in separate JVMs. I've see reports, though,
that increasing the number of JVMs past the number of CPU
cores gets into "iffy" territory.
And, depending on your disk storage they may all be contending for
